Join the fight and contribute to our war chest

Ditch the ads for $5 per month or $49 per year

Whatever shred of credibility “60 Minutes” might have still possessed—which, let’s be honest, wasn’t much—has been completely obliterated. The final nail in the coffin for this disgraced show was a segment they aired featuring a handsome young, preachy “lady” named Kate Starbird, who’s supposed to be a “disinformation expert.” The media loves trotting out these so-called disinformation experts, who often seem to share a certain, let’s say, unique societal-reject style. Who can forget Biden’s zany “Disinformation Czar,” Nina Jankowicz? She’s the one who gave us a Mary Poppins-esque performance, complete with trashy, bargain-bin lipstick.

Once again, Revolver was all over this story right out of the gate. The moment it was announced that she was Biden’s new “Disinformation Czar,” we put together a compelling expose on who Nina really was and what the media was hiding from you.

Revolver:

In 2002, Congress created the DHS to, among other things, secure America’s border from foreign threats. Now, twenty years on, the DHS has repurposed itself to target as domestic terrorists the Americans who complain about what is crossing America’s border. No development could better illustrate how, over the past two decades, the American security state apparatus has evolved from a shield that guards the American people into a weapon that targets them.

But the establishment of the DHS’s Ministry of Disinformation wouldn’t be a proper intelligence community project unless it was absurd as well as dystopian. For the absurdity, we need to look no further than Nina Jankowicz, the disinformation wizard appointed to protect the American people from dangerous speech about illegal immigration and Russia.

So, who exactly is Nina Jankowicz? Certainly, not a person with any concerns about preserving freedom of speech or expression. A quick look at her Twitter history is enough to dispel that. When Facebook permanently banned Donald Trump from its service, Nina was in the wings complaining that this punishment was not harsh enough. Through a metaphor, Nina explained that only mass bans on hundreds or thousands of accounts would be enough to “fix” the disinformation “problem.”

[…]

It’s as if Nina wakes up every morning and thinks, “How can I stifle dissenting opinions today?” She’s like a superhero, but instead of fighting for justice and liberty, she fights to silence anyone who dares to challenge the progressive regime.

Here’s Everything the Media Won’t Tell You About Nina Jankowicz, Biden’s New Minister of Truth

But that’s not all. Meet another preachy “disinformation expert” and lawyer, Barb McQuade, who recently made a baffling and totally incorrect claim about “speedy trials” that was quickly debunked. As you digest her blunder, it’s worth noting that McQuade has written a book on “disinformation” and is peddling it while spreading lies all over the web. And, true to form, Revolver didn’t miss a beat in calling her out on it. The irony of her situation underscores a troubling trend among those claiming to fight misinformation—most of them are the biggest liars out there.

Revolver:

Lately, it’s become painfully clear that many of our so-called “experts” are more influenced by their political leanings than actual expertise. This was glaringly obvious during the COVID pandemic, when the so-called elite offered advice that seemed more politically motivated than medically sound. They told us to wear masks just to walk into a restaurant, but removing them at the table was a safety measure, or that following one-way signs in grocery aisles was life-saving. Then, they pushed a vaccine that couldn’t even halt the virus’s spread. It’s safe to say our “experts” have lost a lot of credibility. But this trend isn’t limited to healthcare. The legal world’s “brightest minds” are also completely compromised and totally blinded by politics and Stage 5 TDS. Their obsession with seeing President Trump behind bars has led them to abandon professionalism and ignore the facts, all in an attempt to sway public opinion. It’s a clear sign that objectivity is once again taking a back seat to their twisted political agendas.

This seems to be the approach of a legal analyst from MSNBC, Barb McQuade. She’s touted as a legal expert and has even penned a book on how “disinformation” is wreaking havoc across the country. Currently, she’s on a PR blitz for her book. Yet, ironically, while she’s out there talking about the dangers of false information, McQuade herself has been caught spreading quite a bit of her own disinformation online. It all started with this post on X, where Ms. McQuade incorrectly stated that the “right to a speedy trial” also belongs to the public. That was her way of arguing that Jack Smith’s attempts to rush Trump’s case aren’t actually “election interference” after all. Wink, wink.

The issue here is that Ms. McQuade is completely off the mark. The right to a speedy trial puts the pressure on the state and the courts to wrap up cases quickly, not on the defense. It’s concerning that she either doesn’t grasp this basic legal principle or is deliberately twisting the facts, possibly to bolster Jack Smith’s case against President Trump.

Just to shine a bit more light on the kind of fraud we’re up against, Barb, the so-called “disinformation expert,” once made a claim about Hunter’s laptop. Of course, she ended up deleting that post.

So, you start to notice a pattern with these preachy disinformation “experts” that the left and the media praise as “all-knowing.” They’re far from credible, hardly experts, and really just progressive soldiers in the Regime’s ranks. And now, enter the “60 Minutes” debacle. Let’s start with a bit of context: CBS, the same folks who went all-in on the Russia hoax and didn’t shy away from the bloodbath hoax, among others, are now the ones sounding the alarm about the spread of “misinformation.” That really highlights just how shameless and appalling our propaganda media has become. Not to mention that this latest so-called “disinformation expert” literally looks like the poster boy for every preachy left-wing “Karen” on the planet.

Her mission? To tarnish, undermine, and attempt to take down Elon’s X platform, which has become the latest thorn in the regime’s side. However, it turns out Ms. Starbird has a real “credibility” issue, and this segment ended up reopening a can of legal worms.

What “60 Minutes” leaves out in their political hit piece on X is that Ms. Starbird is actually caught up in a massive lawsuit. She’s accused of trampling on Americans’ civil liberties with her censorship campaign. Quite the oversight, huh? As a matter of fact, CBS really rallied around the regime, topping off that shameless segment with an official-sounding piece of propaganda garbage.

CBS News:

As big tech firms wrestle with how to keep false and harmful information off their social networks, the Supreme Court is wrestling with whether platforms like Facebook and Twitter, now called X, have the right to decide what users can say on their sites.

The dispute centers on a pair of laws passed in the red states of Florida and Texas over the question of First Amendment rights on the internet. The Supreme Court is considering whether the platforms are like newspapers, which have free speech rights to make their own editorial decisions, or if they’re more like telephone companies, that merely transmit everyone’s speech.

If the laws are upheld, the platforms could be forced to carry hate speech, and false medical information, the very content most big tech companies have spent years trying to remove through teams of content moderators. But in the process, conservatives claim that the companies have engaged in a conspiracy to suppress their speech.

Here’s the latest from America First Legal, spearheaded by Trump loyalist Stephen Miller, on the interview and the lawsuit that’s got Ms. Starbird in the hot seat:

Irony Alert: CBS is guilty of rank disinformation in this interview.

They use Kate Starbird as their “expert”…but they don’t tell you that Starbird is the defendant in our lawsuit alleging a vast scheme to silence speech and deprive Americans of their fundamental civil rights.

And here’s more about Miller and Company’s bombshell lawsuit involving censorship queen Kate Starbird:

BREAKING — We filed a class-action lawsuit against “Election Integrity Partnership” & “Virality Project” for conspiring with the federal government to censor conservative political speech.

We are going after the architects of censorship.Today, we filed a federal class-action lawsuit against key persons and entities involved in the “Election Integrity Partnership” and the “Virality Project,” on behalf of the co-Director of Health Freedom Louisiana and the founder of
@gatewaypundit

Defendants include the Stanford Internet Observatory and its Director and Research Manager, Alex Stamos and Renée DiResta, Dr. Kate Starbird of the University of Washington, Graphika, and the Atlantic Research Council’s Digital Forensic Lab.

This historic lawsuit alleges that these parties conspired with the federal government to conduct a mass surveillance/censorship operation targeting the political speech of millions of Americans on social media platforms.

his operation was specifically designed to target conservative political speech on questions of great public interest like election integrity, COVID-19 vaccines, and vaccine mandates.

he scope of the surveillance and censorship cannot be overstated. The Defendants admitted that during 2020, they surveilled a staggering 859 million posts on Twitter alone and that they tracked for possible censorship almost 22 million Tweets.

During 2021, they tracked posts about COVID with about 200 million engagements for possible censorship. Americans who spoke out against the liberal orthodoxy faced censorship and de-platforming by Big Tech and these elusive surveillance orgs acting with the government.

Our lawsuit alleges that this massive operation was concocted in collusion with government officials — including federal national security officials — to evade the First Amendment, all while shielding the government bureaucracy.

You can read the entire America First Legal thread by clicking here.

James Carville hit the nail on the head. The preachy, dishonest left-wing women are wreaking havoc on both the party and the country. Their incompetence, fraudulence, and readiness to play “puppet” for the higher-ups while hiding behind the thin veil of being “disinformation experts” are doing more harm than good.

George Soros’ disinformation diva takes aim at Revolver News… 

These frauds need to be called out, mocked, and ridiculed at every opportunity, something Revolver has been doing tirelessly. It’s working because some of Soros’ top “disinformation agents” have been targeting us with vengeance.

JOIN THE FIGHT — DITCH THE ADS — READ THE NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL