Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Go ad-free and back the site that refuses to look the other way.

Donate… Help us keep digging into the scandals that powerful people hope fade into footnotes.

Sign up for our email list… Get the receipts before they get buried under another stack of redactions.

Let’s just admit something right out of the gate…

The image of Barry Obama and Susan Rice sitting in the White House, stunned and reportedly crying after Trump won in 2016, is so incredibly delicious. You can just see it, right? The total disbelief, panic, and the “this can’t be happening” energy. This should warm the cockles of any patriot’s heart.

READ MORE: Holy guacamole: California’s avocado farmers are toast…

According to newly compiled audio and video archived by Columbia University as part of the Obama presidential records project, Obama and Susan Rice were reportedly so shaken by Trump’s win that they broke down in front of staff, crying their eyes out in a raw moment of desperation.

It’s so darn satisfying.

Paul Sperry:

BREAKING: President Obama and his National Security Adviser Susan Rice were so distraught after Trump won in 2016 they literally broke down and cried in front of White House staff, according to 1,100 hours of new audio and video compiled by Columbia University in cooperation with the Obama Foundation. After all they’d built, they feared their accomplishments were “at risk” of being torn down by a “con man” and a “clown.” Ergo, Trump had to be stopped?

But here’s the part that actually matters.

What happens when the most powerful people in the world experience that kind of shock and raw emotion? When the political future they were certain of totally collapses in one horrific night?

Does it stay an emotional moment… or does it turn into something much darker?

READ MORE: Hillary and Obama’s latest move spells a massive DEM DISASTER unfolding…

Because we can’t ignore one of the biggest political scandals in US history: SpyGate. It’s real.

The tears are on the surface; they’re the start of this whole mess. Sure, this over-the-top emotional reaction is the big headline. But the real story, the one that still hangs over American politics like unfinished business, is what was already happening before Trump ever took the oath of office.

There is documented evidence that from November 2015 through April 2016, elements inside the Obama administration, working through the FBI under James Comey and Andrew McCabe, were conducting surveillance that targeted Trump.

An NSA compliance officer discovered irregular querying activity. That discovery was reported to NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers. Rogers then restricted FBI access and notified the FISA Court. These audit trails exist. The court responded in a heavily redacted opinion in April 2017 outlining improper searches and systemic abuse.

This became known as SpyGate.

And this is totally separate from the Russia Hoax that dominated headlines for four absurd years. One was an unproven, fake allegation of collusion. But SpyGate was the Obama admin using intelligence tools against political opposition.

This thread walks through the whole chain of events. The surveillance activity, the NSA compliance officer flagging it, and Admiral Mike Rogers cutting off FBI access. It also goes over the notification to the FISA Court and the redacted opinion that quietly confirmed the database had been misused. The one thing that’s still missing is the full notice Rogers sent to the court spelling out exactly who was searched and how often.

The Last Refuge:

1/ During the period of Nov 2015 to April 2016, the Obama administration, through the FBI under James Comey and Andrew McCabe, was conducting a political spying operation against all republican presidential primary candidates using the power of their offices.

The intent was two-fold. (1) Tracking the candidates to identify activity; and (2) conducting opposition research to be fed to the campaign of Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton.

This surveillance activity was happening in concert with Comey, McCabe and a small group inside the FBI, running a defensive operation for the issues surrounding Hillary Clinton’s prior use of private email servers -which included classified information transmission- during her tenure as Secretary of State.

2/ Documentary evidence of the Obama spying operation surfaced as an outcome of the NSA compliance officer discovering the FBI activity.

The compliance officer reported the activity to National Security Agency Director, Admiral Mike Rogers.

The spying operation is not an issue of FISA-702, or any FISA system or process. However, the availability of FBI access to the NSA database is what triggered the discovery of the spy operation.

That FBI access is created under the auspices of FISA, but FISA-702 or any aspect therein was not the issue.

The issue was the spying operation. FISA and using the NSA database to conduct the electronic surveillance, was simply the tool to exploit the electronic communication (metadata) of the targets.

The Obama administration was spying on their political opposition and telling the Clinton team the results of their surveillance.

The United States government was spying on candidates for office in order to control the outcome of the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

3/ After Director Mike Rogers was made aware of the operation, the exploitation of the NSA database, the NSA Director blocked the FBI from access and begun an investigation.

That investigation culminated in Director Mike Rogers informing the regulatory body in charge of protecting the database from exploitation.

FISC:

With the NSA now collecting the private electronic communication of Americans, the FISA Court was assigned the responsibility of oversight; intended to protect the growing metadata library and ensure the 4th Amendment provisions to the constitution were maintained.

The FISC oversight was intended to stop the government from reviewing the private records of Americans, the NSA database, without a warrant.

4/ Because the NSA database was used by the Obama administration, the FBI, to conduct political spying operations, the only normal compliance venue Director Mike Rogers had to reveal the spying was to inform the FISA court (FISC).

NSA Director Mike Rogers was a cabinet member working for President Obama at the time the Obama administration was exploiting the NSA database.

Director Mike Rogers does not appear to have informed congressional oversight. That would have violated the chain-of-command, and the President held absolute power.

Director Rogers could have chosen to inform the congressional Gang-of-Eight of the issue. He did not.

[This is an issue Director Rogers would later address by moving custodial control of the NSA database to Cyber Command (a DoD agency)].

NSA Director Mike Rogers informed the FISA Court of the issue by detailing who the people were who were searched within the database and what the results were over the timeframe of Nov ’15 to April ’16.

The compliance officer provided the audit-trail, audit logs showing who was being spied on, who was being searched (queried), how often and how many times. The audit-trail also showed who was logging in to conduct the spy operations, and what FBI authorized workstations they were using.

Director Rogers informed the court he had blocked FBI access and removed part of the functionality for how the system could be exploited.

The internal investigation by the NSA compliance officer and Rogers was completed and sent to the FISA Court in October 2016, with additional information sent in March 2017.

The FISA Court then responded in April 2017, where Presiding Judge Rosemary Collyer outlined the events in a heavily redacted 99-page opinion. Citation below:

5/ President Obama conducting political spying operations, through a politically weaponized FBI, against the Republican opposition elements is colloquially called “Spygate.”

Hillary Clinton manufacturing a political dirty trick against Donald Trump accusing him of a Trump-Russia collusion conspiracy, is called “Russiagate.”

President Obama and every member of his cabinet that was involved in the spying operations, used Clinton’s “Russiagate” to cover up Obama’s “Spygate.”

The two controversies are distinct and separate.

Within the evidence trail that documents the Obama spying operation exists: (1) the NSA audit-trail, and (2) the NSA notification to the FISA Court that has never been seen.

While a redacted response from the court has been reviewed in granular detail, the missing piece of the puzzle; the evidence that proves the operation beyond any reasonable doubt; is the investigative outcome, the notification to the FISC, given by NSA Director Mike Rogers to the FISA Court.

I have been on the hunt for that notification for 8 years. Now you know why this position is so important.

READ MORE: Private Equity vultures have a new target: mobile homes…

Now put these two things side by side.

On one hand, you have an emotional breakdown over Trump’s victory. On the other, you’ve got documented intelligence database abuse that predated his inauguration and was serious enough to trigger internal alarms and court findings.

Nobody has to spin wild theories to see the pattern forming here.

When powerful people believe something “unthinkable” has happened, and the country is about to fall into the hands of someone they deem illegitimate, that emotional belief can justify a lot of weird power moves in their own minds.

So, was that tearful outburst the catalyst that started all of it? Was that moment of shock that fueled the “he must be stopped” mentality? Probably. The elites were falling apart at the seams.

SpyGate is, by far, one of the biggest political scandals of our lifetime.

People read a thread and think the next step is obvious: arrests.

But scandals at this level aren’t solved by social media outrage or a few viral posts. These kinds of scandals are designed in really thick layers. They protect the top people. They stall and confuse and are a massive web of uncertainty, and that’s all by design in hopes the public gets overwhelmed and moves on.

Still, that doesn’t mean nothing should happen.

READ MORE: Per capita: TRANS are the most dangerous people on the planet…

The American people deserve transparency. They deserve to know whether the intelligence community was used to influence the outcome of an election or to sabotage a sitting US president.

At some point, “we’ll never really know” isn’t good enough.

Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Go ad-free and back the site that refuses to look the other way.

Donate… Help us keep digging into the scandals that powerful people hope fade into footnotes.

Sign up for our email list… Get the receipts before they get buried under another stack of redactions.

NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL — BLUESKY