State Senator Scott Wiener is one of Gavin Newsom’s most prolific allies in the state of California, writing laws that are destroying the state. The word is he has his eyes on Nancy Pelosi’s Congressional seat after she retires. He’s a proud homosexual who loves dressing up in bondage gear on the streets of San Francisco.

Read more:

Wiener’s latest doozy is a law that legalizes women soliciting prostitution on the streets. The law makes it so that cops can no longer scoop up underage prostitutes to rescue them from drug addiction and slavery. It also prevents adult prostitutes from being prosecuted and offered rehabilitation, where they might be able to turn their lives around.

Of course, the New York Times doesn’t bother to tell it’s readers that it was Sen. Wiener who passed the law. They prefer keeping the liberal masses confused and in the dark. Probably some Republican did this!

To make matters worse, Democrats in Los Angeles closed down the schools. Young girls sat at home on social media, making it easier for traffickers to lure girls out of school and onto the streets. Then, the city of Los Angeles slashed police funding during the George Floyd craze, and the vice unit was one of the hardest hit.

Douglass Mackey:

Trafficking in child prostitutes has exploded in Los Angeles. The New York Times outlines exactly how it happened:

1. Democrats shut down the schools during Covid. Result? Girls were home wasting time on social media. Predators had a field day grooming them.
2. Democrats “defunded the police,” and the vice unit was one of the hardest hit.
3. Democrats, in a bill written by Scott Wiener and signed by Governor Newsom, repealed the law against “loitering with the intent to commit prostitution.” Wiener argued that the law “targeted” transgenders and people of color. Police no longer had the tools needed to arrest prostitutes, identify those underage, and force them into rehab and diversion programs.

Of course, they don’t tell you this. The New York Times refuses to tell you why girls were out of school and who put down the schools, why L.A. defunded the police and who voted to do it, or repealed the anti-prostitution law and why they did it.

You have to read between the lines. The NYT prefers to keep its readers confused, angry, and in the dark.

Here’s an excerpt from the article:

For the 77th Street Division, which covers the northern half of the Figueroa Corridor, prostitution had always been a problem. But in recent years, the officers had seen the magnitude of child sex trafficking explode. Part of that boom happened during the pandemic, when many girls were out of school and immersed in social media, where traffickers lurked. Teachers who would ordinarily follow up on absences or report signs of neglect could not.

Gangs that had long sold drugs began to take advantage of Figueroa’s lucrative opportunity. With a dozen girls, one trafficker could easily make $12,000 a night. “Drugs are sold once and gone forever, but girls can be resold indefinitely,” said Navarro, who had been in the division for two decades. Motel owners who noticed the parades of customers but feared the gangs’ retribution kept quiet.

As trafficking grew, the means to deal with it shrank. In 2021, the Police Department’s central human-trafficking unit was disbanded following budget cuts, leaving each division fewer resources to tackle the problem. According to Navarro, the 77th Street Division was supposed to have six investigators at Armendariz’s rank in its vice unit. Instead, she was the only one.

They make it sound like the budget cuts just happened, as if they were a force of God, and not a disgraceful liberal policy decision to “defund the police.”

More:

Their jobs grew even more challenging when California repealed the law allowing the police to arrest women who loitered with the intent to engage in prostitution. The repeal, known as SB 357, was intended to prevent profiling of Black, brown and trans women based on how they dressed. But when it was implemented in January 2023, the effect was that uniformed officers could no longer apprehend groups of girls in lingerie on Figueroa, hoping to recover minors among them. Now officers needed to be willing to swear they had reason to suspect each girl was underage — but with fake eyelashes and wigs, it was nearly impossible to tell. One girl told vice officers that her trafficker had explained things succinctly: “We run Figueroa now,” he said.

Even though the New York Times blatantly ignores the causes of this catastrophe, the piece is well written human interest story that does a good job telling the stories of the lost souls walking the streets and the pimps who exploit them. Read it here.