🎄 Black Friday Super Sale! 20% Off Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Limited Time Only 🎄

Check out the new merch! — Donate…

Sign up for our email list… stay on the bleeding edge… 

The J6 mystery just got even more convoluted. As you know, Revolver News has been at the forefront of peeling back the layers on this staged “Fedsurrection” that targeted President Trump and his supporters. We were among the first to suggest that feds had a significant presence that day, using possible “assets” like Ray Epps and others to stir up the crowd. We also blew the lid off the phony pipe bomb narrative. But as with all things J6, the more we know, the stranger the story gets.

Disgraced FBI Director Chris Wray conveniently resigned just before the IG report dropped.

Wray once testified under oath that there were no undercover agents on the ground at the Capitol. But now, that statement reeks of yet another Swamp word game in action.

READ MORE: A brand new RINO slithers out of the shadows to takedown Hegseth…

Because after the IG report was released, we now know there were dozens (likely way more) of fed informants on the ground and inside the Capitol building.

The word game seems to involve “undercover agent” and “fed informant.”

Meanwhile, the former Capitol Police chief begs to differ. He claims there were undercover agents on the scene.

Here’s Tucker talking about that moment:

Tucker’s full interview with former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund is worth watching.


As our new Vice President correctly points out, if anybody dared suggest there was an undercover FBI presence at the Capitol that day, they were called a “dangerous conspiracy theorist.”

Image

However, for the sake of argument, let’s say Wray and the IG report are right, and there were indeed 26 federal informants on the ground and inside the Capitol on January 6. If that’s the case, Jonathan Turley has a few million-dollar questions he’d really like answered.

Headline USA:

Renowned legal scholar and Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley sounded the alarm about the DOJ’s failure to disclose to Jan. 6 defendants that FBI informants were present in the U.S. Capitol that day in 2021, as detailed in a DOJ Inspector General report.

In a Thursday interview with Fox News host Martha MacCallum, Turley said the report raised “more questions than answers” about the FBI’s rumored role in inciting violence at the Capitol.

The law professor specifically such information would have been critical to defendants of the Jan. 6 protests who fell victim to the Biden DOJ’s aggressive prosecutions.

“In some ways, it raises more questions than answers. It does support Wray’s testimony that there were no undercover agents in the crowd,” Turley said, referring to FBI Director Christopher Wray.

“I think that for others, there is going to be a lot of concern as to what the sources were doing there,” he said, as reported first by the Daily Caller.

One of the biggest questions Jonathan Turley has is why the FBI informants walked free while nearly 1500 average American citizens faced charges, some for nothing more than wandering through the Capitol like curious tourists.

Those are excellent questions, Professor Turley, and Americans deserve answers. The IG report, which we expected to be incomplete with massive, gaping holes, didn’t disappoint. It left a lot out. And Revolver’s Darren Beattie scrutinized the report with a very sharp and knowing eye.

Revolver:

Loyal and longtime readers may recall that we began our very first major report exploring federal involvement in the January 6 Fedsurrection began with a striking exchange between Senator Amy Klobuchar and Christopher Wray, in which Klobuchar asks the FBI director if he had any informants in place prior to January 6th.

Christopher Wray is able to uncomfortably weasel his way out of answering the question directly, partially because Klobuchar does him the courtesy of not asking him the question directly. Klobuchar instead asks the FBI director if he wishes he had infiltrated the militia organizations allegedly involved in 1/6 — assuming from the outset that there was in fact no infiltration, thereby providing the FBI director an easy way to avoid addressing the question one way or another.

Early this afternoon, the Department of Justice finally released its long suppressed Inspector General report on January 6th. The substance of the report, as well as the timing help to shed light on FBI Director Christopher Wray’s seemingly abrupt and premature decision to resign (announced yesterday). Indeed, while the report must be understood in essence as a limited hangout cover-up job released under great reluctance, what it does reveal is damning enough for Christopher Wray, the FBI, and the malicious and discredited Fedsurrection narrative as a whole.

Let’s start with some of the highlights. First, the FBI IG report acknowledges the presence of multiple CHS’s (informants) some of whom were sent to DC for Jan 6 by the FBI, and some of whom went on their own accord and reported to their handlers in the FBI.

[…]

In other words, we see that there were at least three informants who had been tasked directly with following specific targets and informing on their plans in relation to January 6th.

In addition to these three informants who were asked to track specific people well in advance of January 6th, the FBI IG report acknowledges 23 additional informants who traveled to DC on January 6 and reported on the events to their respective FBI handlers:

In addition to these 3 CHSs, we found that 23 other FBI CHSs were in DC on January 6 in connection with the events planned for January 6. None of these FBI CHSs were authorized to enter the Capitol or a restricted area, or to otherwise break the law on January 6, nor was any CHS directed by the FBI to encourage others to commit illegal acts on January 6.
Revolver News has of course been reporting on the presence of informants for years, and it was over three years ago that even the New York Times confirmed our reporting by begrudgingly acknowledging the presence of proud boys informants who were passing on information to their handlers from inside of the Capitol.

Read the full article below to see just how deep the government’s vault of J6 secrets really goes:

DOJ Finally Releases Suppressed IG report on Jan 6: Here’s What They’re Still Covering Up

The IG report is like Pandora’s Box—it was opened and left us with more questions about what really happened that day and serious concerns about how the J6 political prisoners have been mistreated and targeted by their own crooked government.

The good news is, Wray, a real snake in the grass, is on his way out, and President Trump will get to replace him. Hopefully, with someone like Kash Patel, who can dig deep and uncover the truth about what went down at the Nation’s Capitol on that fateful day and give everybody the answers they’ve been hunting for.

🎄 Black Friday Super Sale! 20% Off Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Limited Time Only 🎄

Check out the new merch! — Donate…

Sign up for our email list… stay on the bleeding edge… 

SUBSCRIBE, DITCH THE ADS — NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL — BLUESKY