Buy the TOO BIG TO RIG shirt… hat… mug! — Donate!

Support Our Investigative Work… Pound for Pound, the Most Impactful Journalism in the Country…

Sign up to our email list… stay on the bleeding edge… 

Are you sitting down? Because this one’s a doozy. The DOJ is now working overtime to gag public scrutiny against itself, claiming it leads to “online bullying” and poses a “safety issue” for their staff.

Seriously? Well, if they really want to know what harassment and feeling unsafe looks like, they should try being a Trump supporter for a day.

After all, the Biden-Harris era has been a dark time for political dissent, with countless Americans targeted and persecuted for daring to stand against the regime. The most high-profile “political prisoner” is, of course, President Trump, but the list doesn’t end there. The January 6 defendants, Steve Bannon, Peter Navarro, and even Douglass Mackey, have all felt the heavy hand of a weaponized DOJ.

READ MORE: Murdoch losing it over Gaetz and Gabbard…

But here’s the chilling part—it’s not just politics that can land you on the regime’s hit list. In Texas, a courageous doctor named Ethan Haim was arrested by the Biden administration for refusing to accept and participate in the sexual mutilation of children in his hospital. And the reason we mention him is because he is the one sounding alarm bells over the DOJ’s move to silence criticism against them via a chilling “gag order.”

It likely won’t come as a shock to any of you that the DOJ fabricated charges against Dr. Haim to justify their attack on his moral and professional stand, dragging him through hell in yet another grotesque example of the justice system being turned into a political weapon.

Justice.gov:

The case against Ethan Haim, 34, Dallas, has now been unsealed, and he is set to make his initial appearance before U.S. Magistrate Yvonne Y. Ho in Houston at 2 p.m.

The four-count indictment alleges Haim obtained personal information including patient names, treatment codes and the attending physician from Texas Children’s Hospital’s (TCH) electronic system without authorization. He allegedly obtained this information under false pretenses and with intent to cause malicious harm to TCH.

According to the indictment, Haim was a resident at Baylor College of Medicine and had previous rotations at TCH as part of his residency.

In April 2023, Haim allegedly requested to re-activate his login access at TCH to access pediatric patients not under his care. The indictment alleges he obtained unauthorized access to personal information of pediatric patients under false pretenses and later disclosed it to a media contact.

Tucker Carlson featured Dr. Haim’s case, calling him one of the “rare American physicians” who stands up for what he believes in. He also says doctors these days think they can “create a new type of human.”

The DOJ sprang into action to silence everything and everyone about this case after Dr. Haim exercised his First Amendment right to discuss a publicly available transcript from last week’s open hearing.

Dr. Haim:

As if it couldn’t get any worse, the DOJ has now submitted a motion for a gag order.

This comes after I exerted my first amendment right to discuss a publicly available transcript from last week’s publicly accessible hearing.

The very hearing which the DOJ so thoroughly embarrassed themselves, where their incompetence and the unconstitutionality of their indictment was exposed to the world.

So even though I’m a small-town general surgeon, never been recognized publicly, even though I have friends and colleagues who have never heard of my story, the DOJ wants to take away my first amendment right.

And this is for a case where the DOJ is reinventing criminal law to make HIPAA not about patient privacy but about protecting powerful hospital systems that lie to the people they’re supposed to take care of (the indictment actually says the victims are “TCH and its physicians,” no mention of patients).

And this is for a case where the conduct exposed resulted in the mutilation and sterilization of healthy, young children, which the hospital was lying about, which is illegal in Texas, which initiated a Texas AG investigation into the hospital, which was corroborated by another courageous whistleblower Vanessa Sivadge (@V_Sivadge).

They believe that because I’m just a regular guy, they can intimidate me into silence. But my freedom to speak is more important than their desire to conceal their corruption.

The harder they fight to take away my first amendment right, the harder I will fight to preserve it.

Here’s a closeup of the images Dr. Haim shared:

Image

Image

This is a classic case of stochastic terrorism. What is that, you may be asking? In a nutshell, stochastic terrorism is the made-up theory that public scrutiny and criticism of public figures is intended to indirectly inspire random acts of violence by others. The idea of “stochastic terrorism,” in the DOJ’s playbook, provides a convenient excuse to impose sham gag orders, silencing critics and hiding the sinister truth about their flimsy, politically motivated cases under the guise of preventing “incitement.”

Revolver:

Major medical institutions demanding that the DOJ arrest and imprison their critics represent a new low in how far the American regime will go to quash criticism. But this tactic did not come out of nowhere. Liberals and the left have been stealthily and subversively designing a justification for sweeping speech crackdowns for the past decade, under the label of “stochastic terrorism.”

Stochastic-what? Ten years ago, nobody had even heard of this. But now, it’s everywhere.

[…]

Basically, “stochastic terrorism” is the idea that, when somebody on the right criticizes somebody, they aren’t really just making a political argument. Instead, they are trying to “stoke hatred” in the expectation that some random third party will be “radicalized” and then commit political violence on their behalf.

In the modern sense of the phrase, “stochastic terrorism” was first coined by a left-wing blogger in 2011, who used it to describe the nefarious terrorist activities of, er, Sean Hannity[.]

[…]

[…] “stochastic terror” really took off as a favored term with the arrival of Donald Trump and the concomitant conclusion on the left that America was becoming a fascist dystopian hate-hellscape.

[…]

Recently, the extremist left-wing YouTube program The Young Turks called for banning Tucker Carlson from television because of his “stochastic terrorism.”

It is all a classic use of euphemism to warp what is going on for political ends. Tucker Carlson is a “bully” engaged in “stochastic terrorism,” while the Regime has pet “journalists” who “bring accountability.” And the special magic of this new label is that it is unlimited in scope. It justifies any kind of censorship of anything remotely controversial, with no way to ever disprove an allegation. If you spoke on a controversial topic, and then anyone, anywhere on this planet of 8 billion, became “radicalized” and committed a crime, then you can be labeled a “stochastic” terrorist without any proof at all of foreknowledge, communication, or intent. The term is, in essence, a thought-terminating cliché; any and all crimethink can be shut down with a single point and shriek that the speaker is a “stochastic terrorist.”

The final aspect of stochastic terrorism, the one that truly makes it perfect for the modern ruling class, is that the concept is founded entirely on projection. There is absolutely zero evidence that Donald Trump or Tucker Carlson have ever made a public statement for the purpose of “inciting violence.” The practice of decentralized violence as a tool of political intimidation is entirely limited to the left and is used today by the regime to destroy its enemies.

[…]

Of course, the brilliance of the left’s adoption of “stochastic terrorism” as a concept is that it will never be applied with any kind of consistency or good faith. People within the Overton window of the regime’s politics will never be silenced or punished, no matter how repulsive or inflammatory their behavior. No BLM agitators have ever been accused of “stochastic terrorism” for levying false racism allegations against police, even though those lies have led directly to massive riots and several killing sprees. No Twitter bluecheck will ever be labeled a terrorist for saying we should “punch Nazis” or even shoot them.

Instead, “stochastic terrorism” is the perfect culmination of the left’s reasoning on politics: all dissenting speech is violence, but when they use violence, it is only speech.

You can read this insightful piece by clicking here:

Behold, the Regime Unveils Its New Catchphrase for All Political Dissent: ‘Stochastic Terrorism’

We have covered this method of “lawfare” the regime has been using against the American people, especially when it comes to the “trans movement” as we’re seeing here with Dr. Haim. Take a look at the downright absurd foundation of the DOJ’s latest gag order stunt.

Dr. Haim:

One of DOJ’s arguments for a gag order – “falsely suggest DOJ is making up law and statutes in filings.”

Pretty bold statement given the fact that a few days ago at the Motion to Dismiss hearing, the Judge said, “How are you going to go ahead with the word “use” when it’s not in the statute.”

DOJ conceded, “We are happy to strike the word ‘use’.”

Last I checked, adding words to a statute that aren’t in the statute constitute making up a statute.

Here’s a closeup of the image that Dr. Haim shared:

Image

If this latest “gag order” scheme from the DOJ feels familiar, that’s because they pulled a similar dirty trick during the Douglass Mackey trial. The government’s so-called “star witness,” an obese, shut-in troll who lied endlessly online, was allowed to testify under his pseudonym “Microchip.” Why on earth would they allow that? Well, because he was a federal informant, and also because the DOJ claimed that revealing his identity would lead to bullying and harassment. The irony here is that Mr. Microchip has spent years bullying and harassing countless people online.

Douglass Mackey himself weighed in on this latest gag order attempt, noting how it ties directly back to the underhanded tactics used in his own case.

Doug Mackey:

There is a direct parallel to my case. The government argued that Microchip needed to be allowed to testify under a pseudonym because he might face “online bullying and harassment.”

Even worse, the judge granted the prosecution’s request!

Accepting “stochastic terrorism” as a principle means the end of a free and open society.

Amen. If we allow this to continue, as Mr. Mackey said, it marks the end of a “free and open society.”

S

Truer words have never been spoken.Sadly, this is the Deep State’s playbook, folks. They can’t afford to let the light of day expose their dirty work, so they hide in the shadows, spinning sham gag orders and shielding their flimsy “star witnesses.” It’s all part of their sinister strategy to silence dissent and protect their crumbling narratives.

READ MORE: Four years to save America—our biggest fight against the Deep State starts NOW—We need YOU!

Let’s hope that when the next attorney general steps into power, he takes swift action to end the immoral and unjust persecution of Dr. Haim and launches full-scale investigations into the sham cases against Trump, J6’ers, Bannon, Navarro, Douglass Mackey, and every other victim of this tyrannical, anti-American regime.

2024 was TOO BIG TO RIG… Buy the shirt/hat/mug! — Donate!

SUBSCRIBE, DITCH THE ADS — NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL