If you claim you want to save “precious democracy,” shouldn’t securing elections be the number one priority? Because without secure elections, there is no “precious democracy” to even save, right? This should be the question every media hack grills the Dems on, over and over again—but they never will. Why? Because, let’s face it, they’re just a weaponized arm of the Dem Party, here to do their bidding. The truth is, nobody in this country works harder to turn our elections into a chaotic free-for-all than the Democrats. They don’t even want basic security measures like photo ID. They fight tooth-and-nail against it. As a matter of fact, they work to make sure illegals get what they need to actually vote.
CBS has reported illegals are receiving Social Security cards which allow them to vote in the US because voter registration forms have no proof of citizenship requirement. pic.twitter.com/W3Z3YhGrHp
— JOSH DUNLAP (@JDunlap1974) July 11, 2024
Meanwhile, nearly every American and their brother has an ID, so why are Dems so dead-set against a simple step that would make our elections more secure? The answer’s obvious: they want illegals and other left-wing foreigners on visas to feel free to vote without the hassle of proving who they are. You need an ID to get a membership at a tanning salon, but not to pick the next leader of the free world. Makes sense, right?
Glenn Beck has also found proof that illegals are voting in our elections.
Yes, illegals ARE voting. Election Integrity Network founder @CletaMitchell explains how: “The 2 ways states have historically confirmed identity and residency were driver’s license and social security number. You don’t have to be a citizen to get either of those.” pic.twitter.com/JDuVrJbtY9
— Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) August 28, 2024
Anyone paying the slightest bit of attention can see what’s going on, but when Elon connected the dots on the Dems’ overall “election fraud” plot, it was worth talking about—especially since 2020 is still a gaping wound for many and 2024 is just around the corner. Elon’s take on election fraud is spot-on, and he ties together two key elements: no voter ID and mail-in ballots. As Elon points out, when these two factors are in play at the same time, it becomes nearly impossible to prove fraud. That’s where all the so-called “mystery” around 2020 comes in.
In reality, there was no mystery—it was painfully obvious what happened. But proving it? That’s a whole different story. And that’s the key: burying the evidence under a mountain of uncertainty. This is the post that Elon was commenting on: a list of countries that require voter ID in order to vote. The House Judiciary Committee’s question is, why don’t Dems want it?
But Democrats don’t want it. Why? pic.twitter.com/FFkdTiWqjU
— House Judiciary GOP 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@JudiciaryGOP) September 3, 2024
Here’s a closeup of the image:
Elon’s response says it all.
Because not requiring ID, combined with mail in voting, makes it completely impossible to prove fraud (obviously) https://t.co/PbmwrsMb5L
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 4, 2024
It’s official; Elon has seen the light.
So, how do we fight back against this massive cheating machine? Well, we certainly don’t throw our hands in the air and give up. We need to be diligent, anticipate the tricks the Dems will pull, and counter their efforts. We also need to be willing to get down in the mud a lot more than we currently do. Democrats play dirty, and you can’t win a fight against them by taking the so-called “high road.” And most importantly, we need to show up in droves for President Trump. If we don’t, whatever happens next will be on us.
Meanwhile, President Trump has his part to play, too. He needs to connect with voters—especially white men—and lock in the win over the next couple months. We’ve put together a great piece with suggestions and moves Trump should make to secure a victory on election night. We’re happy to report that he’s already taken a lot of our advice.
In the final weeks of his final campaign, Trump should look for opportunities to create human moments like this. While Kamala lurches from one awkardly scripted event to another, Trump should show off how he is the unmatched master of spontaneous, unscripted interactions with the masses. Trump’s ability to connect with voters on a human level is something that cannot be scripted and is one of the key reasons that Trump is perhaps the one politician in the country who isn’t simply interchangeable with anyone else—even someone who has similar views on policy.
Imagine Trump doing a walkthrough of an American supermarket, chatting with staff, marveling at the price hikes caused by the Biden/Harris administration’s inflation, and then buying groceries for a bunch of shoppers. Imagine him visiting with Corey Comperatore’s fellow firefighters and other first responders when he returns to Butler, Pennsylvania. These encounters will be entertaining to the public, energizing for Trump, and a great way to debunk Democrat attacks on his personal character or supposed “extremism.”
Find a Good Label for Kamala
Lyin’ Ted. Little Marco. Low Energy Jeb. Crooked Hillary. Sleepy Joe.
Donald Trump’s nicknames are infamous, and they even have their own Wikipedia page. When done right, Trump’s nicknames fire up supporters, infuriate his foes, and can even define the race.
A winning Trump nickname is a subtle thing—it’s a little bit mean, a little bit hokey, and a little more aggressive than usual.
Trump has tried out a few different labels for his new opponent, including Crazy Kamala, Laffin’ Kamala, and “Kamabla.” So far, none of them have quite stuck—nicknames are hard work, even for the master.
But there is still ample time to come up with a winner and hang it around Kamala’s neck. Don’t worry about being politically incorrect; if your opponent is getting mad about a nickname, it’s a sign to the whole world that you are right over the target.
What would work best? Lazy Kamala, emphasizing her brutal lack of accomplishments? Killer Kamala, showcasing the tragic implications of her pro-crime policies? Wide-Open Kamala, emphasizing her open-borders lunacy while softly alluding to a few other early career highlights? Many options are out there, and Trump should keep experimenting until he hits on the one that strikes gold.
Attack Kamala on the Issues
Of all the opponents Trump has faced, both Republican and Democrat, Kamala Harris is beyond a doubt the most personally unlikeable. Prior to Joe Biden’s departure from the race, the strongest argument for keeping him around was that Kamala would be his replacement, and approximately zero Democrats were excited at that prospect. Her laugh is so jarring and fake that she’s been coached to avoid it. Her career history is unremarkable, save for unsavory details like getting her start as the mistress of a politician thirty years her senior. She’s a terrible boss who can’t keep staff. She’s a personal and political chameleon, constantly retooling her message, her brand, and even her voice to pander to whatever the cause of the moment is, and this constant switching has left her with no real identity at all.
And yet, it’s probably best if Trump does not make this the focus of his attacks come debate time. Instead, Trump should hammer Kamala on the issues and on her disastrous career as a lifelong California politician. While Kamala has a host of deeply unlikeable personal traits, these traits fall into an awkward twilight zone of being less damaging if they’re pointed out and harped on aggressively.
You can read the entire, in-depth piece by clicking here:
The 75-Day Sprint: The Tactics That Will Win Donald Trump the Election
It’s a good thing we have Elon on our side. If the Dems try to pull any tricks, you can bet he’ll be ready to blast it all over X. It’s truly a godsend that he bought Twitter when he did—it’s definitely helped level the playing field. But we still have a long, long way to go to get this country and our elections back to where they need to be.
JOIN THE FIGHT — DITCH THE ADS — READ THE NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL
Join the Discussion