Annual Ad-Free Subscription… No pop-ups, no noise, no narrative babysitting. Get Revolver ad-free!

Donate… Stories like this only happen because they’re reader-supported. Consider throwing something in the tip jar.

Sign up for our email list… Be the first to see what Congress is digging into next. Join the email list and get the facts before the spin machine fires up.


At this point, the J6 pipe bomb story smells less like a cold case and more like a fish factory in July.

READ MORE: Watch: US school district lowers American flag and raises Somali flag…

For years, under the Biden regime, the FBI said the pipe bomb investigation was still active. But over time, documents, delays, and missing evidence kept piling up that didn’t square with what the public was told. Now, newly released records add another major inconsistency to the story.

Add in the bizarre recent arrest of a so-called pipe bomb suspect, after federal officials now claim Biden’s FBI had the necessary information years ago to make an arrest, and the whole thing starts to feel like a carefully managed mess.

And all of this “mess” raises a question: was the pipe bomb case kept murky for a reason?

If key details were buried or brushed aside, it would explain how the case stayed “unsolved” for years without ever forcing anyone to revisit the mainstream storyline we were all sold: how white Trump supporters orchestrated the whole thing.

Let’s face it, an unsolved mystery is way more useful than an inconvenient solution.

But before Congress showed renewed interest in the J6 saga, investigative journalist Julie Kelly had been flagging some glaring inconsistencies in the FBI’s pipe bomb timeline. Julie focused on what didn’t add up: conflicts between public claims and internal records, unexplained omissions, and witnesses whose accounts didn’t fit the overnight-planting narrative the FBI and media spent years promoting.

Recently, Julie Kelly began flagging serious issues with the story given by the woman who claimed to have discovered the pipe bomb. The timeline conflicts with what the FBI has long said, and Julie wanted to know why those discrepancies were never addressed.

READ MORE: China just made its most heartless move yet against whales, penguins and seals…

Revolver:

We pulled on that loose thread, and the entire pipe bomb hoax started to unravel. Now Julie Kelly, who’s been digging into this shady story as well, has uncovered another damning glitch… and this one could be the final straw that breaks the pipe bomb’s back.

Julie took to X to post her receipts. Here’s the skinny on what she found…

She uncovered yet another massive problem with the FBI’s official pipe bomb story. According to newly released records, Karlin Younger… she’s the woman who supposedly found the pipe bomb and told the FBI she saw the device appear between 12:00 and 12:40 p.m. on January 6.

What does that mean? Well, for starters, it means that it was not there the night before, which is what the FBI has always claimed.

That’s a huge discrepancy.

And why does this matter?

Because the FBI and media have spent years telling the public the bombs were planted on January 5 as part of some highly coordinated plan.

If Younger’s story is true, it blows up yet another FBI narrative and means the device was planted in broad daylight while the chaos at the Capitol was already unfolding. And if that’s how it went down, what does it say about all the supposed “pipe bomber” footage that conveniently shows someone planting a device at night?

On top of that, Younger herself has suspicious ties to law enforcement and a group that received a massive FBI contract, which only makes this story smell even fishier.

What you’ll see next is Julie laying it all out… how the timeline doesn’t match, what the FBI kept hidden for more than four years, and why this could be the final crack in their already shaky case.

Karlin Younger “discovered” the pipe bomb outside the RNC HQ at 12:40pm on Jan 6. I have been raising the odd circumstances of her discovery and inconsistencies in her account for years…

Fascinating. Newly released FBI records n J6 pipe bomb document a tip by Karlin Younger, the woman who allegedly found the device outside the RNC at 12:40pm that day. She told the FBI the device was NOT planted the night before:

Image

 

I have long been suspicious of Younger considering her ties to law enforcement and working with FirstNet, which had just received a $92 million from the FBI. She called in her tip on Jan 8 and was interviewed on Jan 11, 2021. It is my understanding this was her last interaction with the FBI–the case was mostly shut down a few months later despite FBI claims it was active and ongoing–and that she declined an opportunity to sit for an interview with Congressional Republicans. Would an individual who planted the device call in a tip? Unlikely but not impossible. She was on surveillance video walking back and forth to the laundry area as well as her notifying security at the Capitol Hill Club after the “discovery.” At any rate–this represents yet another disclosure the FBI hid from the public and the media for 4+ years.

Image

And now, that brings us back to today.

This week, Chairman Barry Loudermilk sent a formal request to Karlin Younger, looking for a transcribed interview before the House Select Subcommittee. When you first look at the letter, you can see it’s about oversight. But what you might be missing are the bigger implications.

According to FBI records that were not publicly disclosed in the early stages of the January 6 investigation, Younger told agents she did not see a pipe bomb during an earlier trip to the area that day, but noticed the device sometime between noon and 12:40 p.m.

READ MORE: Average Somali IQ is 68, yet they still scammed Tim Walz out of billions. Trump was right…

That directly contradicts the FBI’s long-standing claim that the bombs were planted the night before… a detail critical to framing the incident as part of a broader, premeditated plan.

Here’s a closeup of the letter:

Image

Image

If Younger’s account is accurate, it doesn’t just shift the timeline. It collapses the old narrative.

It would mean the device was placed in broad daylight while chaos at the Capitol was already unfolding and that the public was presented with a version of events the FBI’s own records didn’t fully support… so, in other words, a lie.

Julie Kelly chimed in on the latest.

Whether that discrepancy stems from negligence, narrative protection, or something more deliberate is precisely what Congress now appears intent on finding out.

As you can see, Julie Kelly has been raising red flags for a while now, and with Congress stepping in, it’s clear those questions were important to ask.

At this point, we think it’s fair to ask whether parts of the FBI’s pipe bomb story were shaped to keep attention focused in the wrong direction. If key facts were ignored or sidelined early on, was it to protect a narrative or to avoid following a trail that led somewhere way more uncomfortable for the Biden regime? Either way, Congress is now asking questions the public should have been allowed to ask years ago.

Annual Ad-Free Subscription… No pop-ups, no noise, no narrative babysitting. Get Revolver ad-free!

Donate… Stories like this only happen because they’re reader-supported. Consider throwing something in the tip jar.

Sign up for our email list… Be the first to see what Congress is digging into next. Join the email list and get the facts before the spin machine fires up.

NEWSFEEDFOLLOW ON XGAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIALBLUESKY