Join the Fight and Support Revolver Now… Donate…

Sign up for our email list… Stay on the bleeding edge… 

The Epstein saga has always been a dark, twisted mess, with more questions than answers, but lately it’s become something even more convoluted. What should be a serious search for the truth has turned into a circus of hysteria, emotion, and half-baked claims. Nobody wants to excuse Epstein or his network of predators, but let’s be honest here, the way this issue is being handled right now is raising a lot of eyebrows.

READ MORE: Activist judges furious at Supreme Court — One 5-Word quote to NBC reveals everything…

One journalist, Michael Tracey, has taken a step back from the frenzy and started asking the hard questions that everyone else is ignoring. And he’s exposed some gaping holes and major contradictions in the narrative we’ve been sold for years now. Holes that even right-wing leaders aren’t talking about. Instead, too many of them seem more interested in TV soundbites and camera time than in actually going after the truth.

Take the latest spectacle… there was an “Epstein presser” organized by Republicans Thomas Massie and Marjorie Taylor Greene with a group of so-called “victims.” During the presser they promised they’ll release their own Epstein list of bad actors.

Watch:

But this felt off to a lot of people. If they really had names, why not just release them now? Why tease it out, like some PR event?

Many believe it might be because they actually can’t release any names. Why? Well, perhaps it’s because the evidence just isn’t there to back up the claims and if they released names, they’d be sued.

Eric Daugherty:

 

Shawn Farash:

Do you know what this actually means?

This means the victims do not possess enough evidence that would shield them from getting sued.

I want to believe these victims but this means straight up that their claims will NOT hold up in court.

It means that iron-clad evidence doesn’t exist anymore.

No “blackmail tapes”, no “client list”… Which honestly is a shame, but that’s what is being admitted here.

There may not be some neat and tidy formal list with video evidence to put the bad guy at the scene of the crime. And that’s the danger here… when real questions get buried under shaky claims, it gives the anti-Trump forces on both sides of the aisle an opening to weaponize Epstein against him. And that’s exactly what they’re doing right now.

READ MORE: Tapper just got caught with his hand in the cookie jar — the internet never forgets…

Many people were angered when they saw Marjorie Taylor Greene at an event with signs calling President Trump a “traitor” and claiming he’s on the list.

People were also angered at Thomas Massie for his part in the event.

Insurrection Barbie:

Thomas Massie went on television and threw out a name of a republican donor who donates to President Trump, and who is trying to unseat him without providing one shred of evidence other than conjecture and opinion.

This person’s name is not in any of the Epstein documents that have been released, and I actually looked, there has not been one victim who has named this guy. There have been victims that have definitely named other rich, powerful men as their abusers but not this one.

This is after 250 victims were begged by JP Morgan Chase Deutsche Bank to name their accusers during a settlement. Begged.

But sure please tell me again about how this is about principles.

Last I checked, trying to destroy a man by linking him to Epstein without any proof is actually the opposite of having principles.

Meanwhile, according to the victims, President Trump had nothing to do with any of this.

But beyond all the “what ifs,” the bizarre press conferences and the soundbites, there are real questions and the answers might make some people very uncomfortable.

That’s where journalist Michael Tracey comes in. He’s written a piece on the Epstein “victims,” and it’s clear there’s a lot we haven’t been told.

READ MORE: All hands-on deck: You’re not gonna believe what’s about to unfold in Asheville, NC…

Tracey attended the Epstein press event himself and directly questioned a member of Congress. That’s when things got tense. He had an uncomfortable back-and-forth with Rep. Thomas Massie over the supposed “hundreds of victims” he claims there are. Massie didn’t like the questions, got agitated, and at one point Tracey was even removed from the event.

Here’s part of that incident in Michael’s words.

Michael Tracey:

“I’m convinced there were hundreds of victims,” Massie continued. “Like I can’t tell you who is who — who had what happen to them. But I’m convinced there are hundreds of victims. And I’m convinced there’s somebody besides Epstein that’s done bad things.”

I then blew my cover, and asked Massie: “How do you know there are hundreds of victims, if you don’t know what happened to them?”

Massie scoffed at me, and turned away in annoyance, evidently not wanting to engage any further. I guess because he considered me to be so very “rude.”

“I don’t understand, Congressman,” I said to him. “I’ve always been very nice to you, and favorable toward you. And I just asked you some basic questions, and I guess you’re getting flustered. I don’t really get it.”

However, it’s easy to see why Massie might’ve been reluctant to delve into the meddlesome details.

What Michael uncovered looks a lot like a sequel to the #MeToo hysteria, where many women (though not all) saw it as a chance to cash in on notoriety and money. Michael’s piece continues:

Among the purported “victims” present yesterday was Annie Farmer — one of the four government-identified “victims” (out of what we’re told is “over a thousand”) who was called to testify at the 2021 criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

In his piece, Michael notes that when Annie was interviewed by the FBI in 2006 and again in 2020, she never mentioned sexual abuse by Epstein or Maxwell. But then, he says something changed.

 Her tune changed when the Epstein Victims Compensation Program got established, and millions of dollars became available. That’s when she told the settlement fund’s mediator that she considered alleged acts such as “hand-holding” to be “sexual abuse.”

Annie Farmer — now a “licensed psychologist” specializing in “trauma” — also appears to have appointed herself as an all-purpose spokeswoman for the growing social network of alleged Epstein “victims.” And she’s been making lots of media appearances lately, under the professional moniker of “Survivor.” Which is a bit odd. You’d think “Dr. Farmer” would maybe want to be identified by her self-publicized professional title, “licensed psychologist.” But it seems “Epstein Survivor” is more lucrative. “I am not currently accepting new clients,” her website says.

And then there’s Annie’s sister, Maria, who many believe is a certified crackpot, yet she also claims to be a “victim.” But her story is more complicated than just being Annie’s long-suffering sister. Michael’s piece continues:

Maria Farmer claims she called the NYPD, then the FBI, in 1996 to report some kind of pedophilic conspiracy going on in Ohio which she claimed involved Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and the “Jewish mafia.” She claims to have been given multiple cancers by Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and possibly also Trump and/or Clinton. She claims to have had some sort of divine epiphany that allowed her to realize Epstein and Maxwell were “pedophiles” — after voluntarily climbing into bed with them, at age 26. At which point she claims she was “raped” of her “sanity.” To redress these profound wrongs, Maria Farmer has now filed a brand new lawsuit, circa May 2025, demanding $600 million from US taxpayers to compensate her for the “complex PTSD, debilitating fatigue, chronic illness,” and myriad other conditions she claims to have endured for the past 30 years. I wonder if Annie Farmer gave Maria the PTSD diagnosis?

Michael, who has long been very fair to Thomas Massie, is troubled and confused by how he’s handling this issue. His piece continues:

Thomas Massie says he’s “convinced there were hundreds of victims,” but again — how does he know this? How much has he bothered to examine the actual facts and evidence around this case — which he’s now anointed himself such a bold crusader on? Is he aware that none of the “victims” who appeared at the press conference yesterday have ever actually been adjudicated as victims in any kind of meaningfully adversarial process? That is, with their claims tested and appropriately scrutinized for veracity?

But sadly, there’s more. It turns out that being an Epstein “victim” can also be very profitable. Michael’s piece explains:

Annie Farmer was declared by Judge Alison Nathan to have endured no “illegal sexual activity” at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. The same was judicially declared of Anouska De Georgiou, another of the four “victims” who the government chose to call at the 2021 Maxwell trial. Anouska also spoke at the press conference yesterday, weepily recounting that for “so many years” her “voice” had been “silenced.”

“Make no mistake, my polished exterior is a shield hiding a wound that still bleeds,” Anouska poetically proclaimed. Hopefully her “wounds” were at least partially healed by the $3.25 million she received from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. (By the way, these settlement payouts are tax-free! What a deal!)

S

One so-called “victim,” Anouska De Georgiou, was an adult, not a minor, when she became involved with Epstein and Maxwell. In his piece, Michael includes a rather saucy photo of Ms. De Geroggiou at a Hollywood movie premiere, along with this disturbing detail:

The above photo would’ve been taken many years after she’d allegedly been ensnared by the most prolific child-sex trafficking operation in American history, and perhaps world history, based on the histrionics that have now become so commonplace. It was also during this time that she was continuing to maintain consensual contact with Jeffrey Epstein — which she did throughout her 20s, and even into her 30s. By 2008, when she was around 31, Anouska De Georgiou emailed Epstein while he was incarcerated in Florida, and offered to send him photos of herself. In 2010, she started dating noted actor David Hasselhoff. In 2011, she apparently broke up with Hasselhoff, and again initiated emails with Epstein, asking to visit and stay with him in New York.

According to the piece, it wasn’t until her “40s” that Ms. De Georgiou underwent “deprogramming” and realized she was an Epstein victim after all.

READ MORE: While you were sleeping, Trump was on a comedy roll that had the internet LOL’ing…

According to Michael, and he notes this in his piece, which we encourage you to read here, Marjorie Taylor Greene actually tried to have him arrested when he started asking tough questions.

Michael says he has much more information from yesterday’s event, so be sure to check out his Substack.

In closing, we want to reiterate that none of this is about running cover for Epstein or dismissing survivors. It’s about asking the tough questions and digging deeper… the same thing we tell the left to do all the time. If we don’t hold ourselves to that same standard, we risk getting swept up in hysteria instead of uncovering the truth.

Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Join the Fight and Support Revolver Now…

Check out the new merch! — Donate…

Sign up for our email list… Stay on the bleeding edge… 

NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL — BLUESKY