• Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Lists
    • Yearly Top Tens
    • Trailers
Menu

World of Reel

Street Address
City, State, Zip
Phone Number
Home
IMG_7217.jpg
Francis Ford Coppola Turned a Chicago Q&A Into a Surreal 2-Hour Manifesto: “I’m Broke Now”
IMG_7216.jpg
‘Fantastic Four: First Steps’ to Match or Even Outgross ‘Superman’ Opening With $125M+ Weekend
IMG_7207.jpg
Telluride 2025: Scott Cooper’s Springsteen Biopic to Lead World Premieres
IMG_7206.jpg
Vince Gilligan’s ‘Pluribus’ Finally Has a Title and Release Date — What It’s Actually About Remains a Mystery
Screenshot 2025-07-25 142637.png
10 Years Later — The Best Films of 2015
Featured
Capture.PNG
Aug 19, 2019
3-Hour ‘Midsommar' Director's Cut Screened in NYC
Aug 19, 2019

This year’s 12th edition of the Scary Movies festival at Film at Lincoln Center premiered Ari Aster’s extended version of “Midsommar” this past Saturday.

Aug 19, 2019

World of Reel

  • Home
  • Reviews
  • Interviews
  • Lists
  • More
    • Yearly Top Tens
    • Trailers

‘Rush Hour’ Slapped With Trigger Warning: “This Movie Was Created in A Different Time”

July 5, 2025 Jordan Ruimy

It finally happened. “Rush Hour” — yes, the 1998 Jackie Chan–Chris Tucker buddy cop comedy — has been deemed too problematic for modern audiences.

USA Network recently aired the film with a trigger warning slapped on before the opening credits. The message read:

We all love our buddy comedies … but this movie was created in a different time. FYI certain depictions, language and humor may seem outdated and at times offensive

We’ve entered an age where satire, and even just broad comedy from a pre-social media era are being flagged like hazardous material. “Rush Hour,” with its broad humor, culture clashing, and PG-13 jokes, is hardly “Birth of a Nation. And yet, it’s been put in the same moral penalty box as films with genuinely outdated or questionable content.

This isn’t the first time we’ve seen this. In the past few years, we’ve watched the cultural reevaluation brigade go after “Goodfellas,” “Gone With the Wind,” and “Blazing Saddles” — each introduced on cable or streaming with some form of a content advisory message warning of racial or gender-based “insensitivities.”

“Goodfellas” got slapped with a warning for its violence and portrayals of toxic masculinity. “Gone With the Wind” was temporarily pulled by HBO Max (before returning with a warning intro).” Blazing Saddles,” Mel Brooks’ razor-sharp satire that skewered racism by being racist, now comes wrapped in a warning label reminding you that it contains …well, satire.

In theory, these labels are meant to provide “context.” In practice, they’re an awkward attempt to avoid controversy while still showing the film. They come off as a lecture, like you’re being told you’re too dim to interpret a film—or any work of art—on your own. As if audiences need to be talked down to, guided by a moral babysitter. It’s a condescending slap in the face, an outright insult to our intelligence.

We’re not talking about 1930s propaganda reels here. We’re talking about “Rush Hour” — a mainstream, crowd-pleasing studio comedy that grossed $244M worldwide, spawned two sequels, and made Jackie Chan a household name in America. It was on basic cable for two decades without incident.

At least there’s been pushback on “Trigger Warnings,” from some creatives, including Judi Dench, Cate Blanchett, and Quentin Tarantino, who have all rallied against it, with the latter saying ..

I reject the word “offended”. Anyone can be offended by anything. Frankly, I think most of the time – and there are no doubt some exceptions – saying that you are “offended” by a film is the first response of a very narrow mind. “I didn’t like it, and here’s why, blablabla…” But, man, being offended? Art is no offense. And, although, in rare cases, I can understand it, it's just ridiculous to be offended by the content of a film.

There’s a fatigue setting in with these content warnings — a sense that we’re not protecting people from harm so much as treating them like delicate children. Adults are capable of understanding that movies reflect the time in which they were made. They don’t need to be coddled or reminded that the year was 1998.

← ‘Jurassic World: Rebirth’ Eyes $145M Holiday WeekendPOLL: Ryan Coogler’s ‘Sinners’ Tops 2025 (So Far), According to 150+ Critics →

FOLLOW US!


Trending

Featured
Capture+(3).png
‘Megalopolis': Francis Ford Coppola To Re-Edit, Add Scenes, “Make it More Weird"
IMG_7047.jpg
Margot Robbie to Star in Tim Burton’s ‘Attack of the Fifty Foot Woman’
IMG_7024.jpg
20 Years Later — The Best Films of 2005
IMG_7002.jpg
Paul Thomas Anderson’s ‘One Battle After Another’ to Skip Fall Festivals Entirely
IMG_6985.jpg
Ari Aster Planning ‘Eddington’ Sequel, a Horror Film, and a Sci-Fi Project. Will He Get to Make Any of Them?

Critics Polls

Featured
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘Vertigo’ Named Best Film of the 1950s, Over 120 Participants
B16BAC21-5652-44F6-9E83-A1A5C5DF61D7.jpeg
Critics Poll: Kubrick’s ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ Tops Our 1960s Critics Poll
Capture.PNG
Critics Poll: ‘The Godfather’ Named Best Movie of the 1970s
public.jpeg
Critics Poll: ‘Do the Right Thing' Named Best Movie of the 1980s
Critics Poll: ‘Mulholland Drive' Named Best Film of the 2000s
g4.jpg
Critics' Poll: ‘Goodfellas' Named Best Movie of the 1990s
Critics Poll: ‘Mad Max: Fury Road' Named Best Movie of the 2010s
World of Reel tagline.PNG
 

Content

Contribute

Hire me

 

Support

Advertise

Donate

 

About

Team

Contact

Privacy Policy

Site designed by Jordan Ruimy © 2023