For too long, our leaders have been selling our country off for parts.
Today, President Trump put America First. Here's why. 🧵
Since the end of the Cold War, U.S. trade policy has been an unmitigated disaster.
We've shipped millions of good jobs overseas, hollowed out our industrial capacity, and sacrificed our sovereignty on the altar of the "global economy"—while other nations reap the benefits.
Independence was the founding principle of our republic. It was the principle that drove our ancestors to revolution.
But a nation that can't make things is not independent.
We were once the manufacturing powerhouse of the world. Now we can't even make the stuff we invented.
Since 2001, our trade deficit with China has led to the loss of approximately 3.82 million American jobs.
Millions more Americans now work in government than manufacturing—consuming, not producing, American wages.
Think about what that means for the *kind* of economy we have.
The result is that we're no longer self-reliant. We rely on other countries for our most essential goods: Pharmaceuticals and antibiotics, medical supplies, electronics, manufacturing equipment, the semiconductors we need for everything from computers to fighter jets—you name it.
So how did this happen?
The promise of globalism was that we would all become fabulously wealthy together—going forward as one into a new utopia without borders, nations or peoples.
But the price of entry was selling our sovereignty—even as others didn't play by the same rules.
The American people never voted for this. It was foisted on them by a class of elites—in business, government, and culture—who no longer thought of themselves as Americans at all, but saw themselves as "citizens of the world," with no loyalty to the nation they were plundering.
"More of the same" is an unacceptable offer.
President Trump ran and won on taking back control of our country.
This is what the American people voted for: Reclaiming our sovereignty and putting America first.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
According to some estimates, America would run out of key munitions in “less than one week” in a major conflict with China.
Less than one week.
We can't keep fighting other people's wars. It's time for America to come home. 🧵
A few quick data points.
As I mentioned above: In 2023, @CSIS ran a series of war games for a U.S.-China conflict in the Taiwan Strait. In every single scenario they ran, the U.S. ran out of critical munitions—such as long-range, precision-guided munitions—in less than one week.
To make matters worse, China is currently acquiring high-end weapons systems 5-6X faster than we are.
Our stockpiles are depleted. Our industrial capacity is exhausted.
The hard truth that many in DC won't say: Replenishing these systems will take years—not weeks or months.
This is a huge win — not just for America, but for all of Western civilization.
Here’s why. 🧵
Much of this has already been documented at length: Through USAID, billions of U.S. tax dollars were funneled to radical NGOs, media outlets, "civil society" groups, and foreign bureaucracies that actively worked against both American interests and conservative values worldwide.
These left-wing systems operate across borders, through international bureaucracies and NGOs.
So the left-wing activism we fund abroad always comes home.
For example: The State Department dumped billions into refugee NGOs that facilitated mass migration in Europe AND America.
Judge James Boasberg has now been assigned his FOURTH major Trump case.
This happens far too often. Big conservative cases magically end up in the hands of far-left judges. They tell us it's "random"—but it's not.
I'm demanding a full investigation, answers, and reforms. 🧵
Administrative court clerks’ offices assign cases to specific judges behind closed doors. Today, I wrote a letter to Judge Van Totenhove—the Chairman of the Rules Committee on the Judicial Conference of the United States—demanding a full investigation and reform of this process.
Administrative court clerks’ offices assign cases to specific judges behind closed doors. Today, I wrote a letter to Judge Van Totenhove—the Chairman of the Rules Committee on the Judicial Conference of the United States—demanding a full investigation and reform of this process.
This operation is a dangerous marriage of public and private power—a global system of security agencies, tech firms, activist groups, nonprofits, media orgs and government bureaucracies taking what they describe as a "whole-of-society" approach to censoring disfavored speech.
Make no mistake: This isn't just a few fringe radicals. Sure, they're the ones who are out there tossing Molotovs in the streets. But the entire institutional Left—from the media to the education system to the Democratic Party itself—colludes to encourage, justify and excuse it.
🚨 President Trump just fired the two unaccountable Democrat Commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission. This bold action challenges the core thesis of the Administrative State (that technocrats should be politically insulated) and challenges the incredibly errant 1935 Supreme Court case Humphrey's Executor, which helped create the Deep State 🧵 x.com/afergusonftc/s…
Throwing it back to your high school civics class: our nation was founded upon the idea that We the People get to pick our federal government: locally we elect members of Congress, states elect Senators, and nationally, we elect the President. All of the other people who work in our government are selected directly or indirectly by these elected officials. /2
Article II of the Constitution vests the power to execute the laws in its one officer, the President. For nearly the first century of the republic, the President could hire, fire, or appoint anyone who worked in Article II because the President has the sacred duty to "take care" that the laws of the US be “faithfully executed”