Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Join the Fight and Support Revolver Now…
Check out the new merch! — Donate…
Sign up for our email list… stay on the bleeding edge…
At this point, the left isn’t even trying to hide their lawfare. Judge James Boasberg—the Deep State loyalist and rent-a-gavel—has now been handed his fourth Trump-related case.
Four.
RELATED: Trump, DOGE, American people win BIG, activist judges take the ‘L’…
And we’re supposed to believe that this is just a coincidence? No. The left’s shameless weaponization of the judiciary has moved from subtle plots and plans to straight-up Soviet Union-type chess moves. Judge Boasberg is no longer pretending to be impartial—he’s the go-to hitman for the Deep State regime, and he’s happily rubber-stamping whatever political prosecution the DC Swamp throws his way. And these power players couldn’t care less that the American people see exactly what’s going on. As a matter of fact, they know we see it—and they’re doing it anyway, with a snicker on their face.
Now, former Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt is calling it like it is, and he’s demanding a full investigation into how these cases are being assigned, because the truth is this: our system isn’t transparent.
READ MORE: Dan Bongino: These docs have been stonewalled from Americans for 8 years… not anymore…
Behind closed doors, court clerks are handing out high-profile, politically sensitive cases—and somehow, they keep landing in the laps of far-left, Deep State-friendly judges like Boasberg.
We’ve been covering the Boasberg plot from every imaginable angle. We recently published a piece that ties Boasberg to shadowy J6 figure Ray Epps in a very disturbing way.
James Boasberg isn’t just some random DC judge—he’s the Deep State’s go-to gavel. He’s a loyal foot soldier in the left’s lawfare machine. When the Swamp needs a ruling to punish the right and protect their own, Boasberg always delivers. And nowhere is that more obvious than in the case of the very mysterious character Ray Epps.
Ray Epps—the guy caught on camera urging people to “go into the Capitol.”
The connection between these two men—Boasberg and Epps—should concern every American. It’s one of the clearest, most flagrant displays of the left’s weaponized lawfare to date.
[…]
After Epps was finally charged—with a single count of disorderly conduct—he was rewarded with a wrist slap from Boasberg: one year of probation. No jail. No lectures. No talk about mobs or responsibility. Just a quiet walk out the back door.
Thanks to Boasberg, Ray Epps walked away unscathed. Meanwhile, people who did far less were dragged through the mud, lectured by Boasberg, and sentenced to time behind bars—including a non-violent older married couple, one of whom was battling a cancer diagnosis.
You can read the entire article below:
The Judge Boasberg/Ray Epps connection should scare every American…
But the evidence of this dangerous double standard just keeps stacking up.
Eric Schmitt also points out that Boasberg wasn’t even the on-call judge for the infamous “gangbanger” case, but he still got it. How? Let’s be real; we all know this isn’t just some random glitch—it’s clearly a rigged process that’s being used to target conservatives while pretending to be somehow fair. And according to Schmitt, this isn’t new. It’s been going on for years in courts across the country.
Judge James Boasberg has now been assigned his FOURTH major Trump case.
This happens far too often. Big conservative cases magically end up in the hands of far-left judges. They tell us it’s “random”—but it’s not.
I’m demanding a full investigation, answers, and reforms. 🧵
Administrative court clerks’ offices assign cases to specific judges behind closed doors. Today, I wrote a letter to Judge Van Totenhove—the Chairman of the Rules Committee on the Judicial Conference of the United States—demanding a full investigation and reform of this process.
Administrative court clerks’ offices assign cases to specific judges behind closed doors. Today, I wrote a letter to Judge Van Totenhove—the Chairman of the Rules Committee on the Judicial Conference of the United States—demanding a full investigation and reform of this process.
That has allowed some judges, like Judge Boasberg, to accumulate a high volume of politically sensitive cases involving President Trump.
For example: Judge Boasberg got the Tren de Aragua case…despite not being the on-call emergency assignment judge.
Concerns about “nonrandomness” in judicial case assignments are not new.
It’s an open secret for members of the appellate bar that different Circuit Courts of Appeals rig their case assignment system to a degree based on local rules, practices and even unspoken “norms.”
We’ve seen this happen across the country.For example, on the Ninth Circuit, the infamous liberal Judge Stephen Reinhardt was able to force his way onto many of the nation’s highest-profile appeals on issues like same-sex marriage during the Obama era.
Eric also shared what he saw firsthand during his time as Missouri’s Attorney General—and it’s exactly the kind of pattern we’re seeing with Boasberg…
He noticed that politically sensitive cases kept landing in the lap of the only Dem-appointed judge on the Eighth Circuit. And it was happening at a rate that was statistically impossible. Turns out, the people assigning those cases behind the scenes were former clerks of that judge, and they all shared the same twisted left-wing ideology. Schmitt is now demanding real reform and transparency:
When I was Attorney General of Missouri, I noticed a disturbing trend.
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals assigned politically-sensitive cases to panels with Judge Kelly—the only active judge on the circuit who was appointed by a Democrat—at a statistically impossible rate.
It’s a long list — I included the receipts in my letter to the Judicial Conference.Here’s the issue: The cases were being assigned by Circuit Court clerks’ office, which was filled with former Judge Kelly clerks — and their ideological compatriots.
On March 12, the Judicial Conference “strengthened the policy governing random case assignment” in district courts. But they didn’t show their work.
1. We must see this policy change and its accompanying guidance.
2. The real issue still lies in the Circuit Court of Appeals.
When judicial selection isn’t blind, American justice isn’t blind. It allows the opaque machinery of the court bureaucracy to put its thumb on the scale.
Blind justice is a bedrock of the Anglo-American legal tradition. It’s one of the core pillars that uphold our freedom.
That’s why I’m demanding the Judicial Conference’s Committee on Court Administration and Case Management investigate, answer questions related to, and reform the rules and practices of our Article III courts case assignment. It’s time to make American justice blind again. —End
We need this reform because when judicial selection isn’t blind, justice isn’t either. And if this system keeps being quietly rigged behind the scenes, it’s not just Trump at risk—it’s all of us.
Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Join the Fight and Support Revolver Now…
Check out the new merch! — Donate…
Sign up for our email list… stay on the bleeding edge…
NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL — BLUESKY
Join the Discussion