🎄 Black Friday Super Sale! 20% Off Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Limited Time Only 🎄

Check out the new merch! — Donate…

Sign up for our email list… stay on the bleeding edge… 

The good news keeps rolling in, folks. After the Supreme Court’s decision to axe unfair, DEI-driven, race-based admissions, some law schools are seeing a sharp decline in black and Hispanic students. The steepest drop is happening at Harvard. The so-called “pinnacle of excellence” sacrificed its reputation to prop up the left’s DEI charity agenda. Now, thanks to the Supreme Court, Harvard will be forced to admit students based on merit, not skin color—which is a win for everyone. After all, no one should want a handout they didn’t earn.

However, not everyone sees it that way. The folks over at The New York Times are tied up in knots over the decline in racist school admissions. Apparently, they’d rather universities pick students by skin color than by excellence—and they’re perfectly fine watching greatness take a nosedive across business, education, medicine, and beyond. And by the sound of their new article, it seems NYT is terrified there will be fewer Barack Obamas and Ketanji Brown Jacksons in the ranks.

Yes, God forbid we end up with less of this so-called “greatness”…Maybe her next Broadway show can tackle what the definition of a “woman” is?

https://twitter.com/americanfaith/status/1868775528041529615

Or who can forget that time the incredible legal scholar, Barry Obama, confidently announced he’d visited “57 states”?

This is the type of “excellence” the NYT will miss…

The New York Times:

The number of Black students entering Harvard Law School dropped sharply this fall after last year’s Supreme Court decision banning affirmative action in college admissions, according to enrollment data released on Monday.
Harvard Law enrolled 19 first-year Black students, or 3.4 percent of the class, the lowest number since the 1960s, according to the data from the American Bar Association. Last year, the law school’s first-year class had 43 Black students, according to an analysis by The New York Times.

While changes in data calculation might explain some year-to-year changes, the decline at Harvard was much sharper than at other elite law schools. It was notable not only for its severity but also because of the school’s past role in educating some of the nation’s best-known Black lawyers, including former President Barack Obama, the former first lady Michelle Obama, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and the former Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick.

The Supreme Court decision, and the fact that Harvard College was named in the case, played a role, according to David B. Wilkins, a Harvard law professor who has studied Black representation in the legal profession.

“This obviously has a lot to do with the chilling effect created by that decision,” Mr. Wilkins said on Monday.

We’ve covered the DEI disaster from every angle, and it all adds up to the same failed equation: your business, country, hospital, or university can’t be the best if you’re hiring subpar candidates just to fill a progressive “guilt quota.” We recently published a fascinating article exposing the truth about DEI Black students at Penn State. It’s a real eye-opener.

Revolver:

Isn’t it ironic how the left touts itself as the champion of fighting “disinformation,” yet they’re the ones silencing the truth and punishing anyone brave enough to speak out? This is especially true when it comes to topics like black crime statistics and DEI students who aren’t cutting the mustard. So, if you dare to talk about real, raw issues, especially involving black students, you’re instantly labeled a “racist,” blacklisted, and shut down. That’s exactly what’s happening to University of Pennsylvania Professor Amy Wax, who dared to discuss the fact that no black students made it into the top quarter of Penn Law School’s class of 2023.

That’s an important and noteworthy revelation—one that deserves attention, not censorship.

However, the woke DEI-pushers leading Penn saw it differently. Now, her entire career trajectory has been derailed because she spoke up. The DEI-obsessed faculty at Penn came down on her with a vengeance, determined to make an example of anyone who challenges their agenda and speaks the truth.

Steve Sailer:

Of all of Professor Amy Wax’s myriad sins against the Woke worldview, the one that seems to have gotten the Penn Law School administration most obsessively angry with her was what she told Brown U. economist Glenn Loury during a 2017 podcast discussing the “downside of affirmative action. According to CNN:

“Here is a very inconvenient fact Glenn, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a black student graduate in the top quarter of the class and rarely, rarely in the top half,” Wax told Brown University professor Glenn Loury in a video of the interview that recently gained attention.

When asked to elaborate, Wax said she was basing her numbers on personal data.

“I have a class of 89, 95 students every year. I see a big chunk of students every year – so I am going on that, because a lot of this data is a closely guarded secret.”

We encourage you to read the entire piece linked below. It will show you just how far the left will go and the lies they’ll spread to keep DEI alive:

Penn muzzles fearless conservative professor for exposing truth about DEI black students…

But these declines aren’t just happening at Harvard—many other U.S. universities gleefully took part in DEI-driven, race-based enrollment that was not only illegal but downright immoral. The New York Times piece goes on.

Black and Hispanic enrollment also decreased at the University of North Carolina. The university was also named as a defendant in the cases decided by the Supreme Court, brought by the anti-affirmative action group Students for Fair Admissions. Black first-year students at U.N.C. dropped to 9 students this year, from 13 last year; Hispanic students dropped to 13 from 21 last year.

Each year, the American Bar Association compiles and releases information on its 198 accredited law schools that includes not only demographic data but also information on acceptance rates, Law School Admission Test scores, faculty and expenses.

The A.B.A. changed its reporting categories this year to include students who were not U.S. residents in the racial and ethnic breakdown of the class. Last year, they were a separate category. The change complicates year-to-year comparisons, and could help explain why some schools, like New York University, Columbia University and the University of Pennsylvania, had big increases in Asian students.

The share of Black first-year undergraduate students at Harvard this fall also dropped, to 14 percent from 18 percent last year, according to data released in September.

Mr. Wilkins said the admissions numbers at Harvard illustrated the negative impact of the Students for Fair Admissions litigation and the additional barriers it had created for prospective Black lawyers.

As we watch these numbers plummet—especially at universities named in the lawsuit that reached the Supreme Court (Harvard and UNC, for example)—you have to wonder just how many unqualified students were being pumped through those hallowed halls to meet some “progressive quota.” And while that was happening, how many qualified students, who worked their tails off to get there, were tossed aside because they didn’t have the “right” skin color?

READ MORE: The MacArthur Joke ‘Geniuses’ Are Proof DEI Is Still Dominant

What’s even more astounding is that the left sees nothing wrong with this, as long as it serves their agenda.

🎄 Black Friday Super Sale! 20% Off Annual Ad-Free Subscription… Limited Time Only 🎄

Check out the new merch! — Donate…

Sign up for our email list… stay on the bleeding edge… 

SUBSCRIBE, DITCH THE ADS — NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL — BLUESKY