Join the fight and contribute to our war chest.

Ditch the ads for $5 per month or $49 per year.

Sorry, ladies, you blew your shot. That’s what every female Secret Service agent on Trump’s security detail should be hearing after the disastrous collapse of basic security at the Pennsylvania rally. This breach was so horrific it placed innocent Americans in harm’s way—all because a group of Keystone Ladies couldn’t pull it together long enough to get the job done.

If you’re looking for some hard truth, here it is: the Secret Service should only employ fit, strong men. Sorry, ladies, but this isn’t a Ghostbusters remake. This is real life.

These women struggle with the basics, like figuring out how to wear sunglasses, let alone holstering a gun during a real national crisis. Not to mention, many appear out of shape and in dire need of nutrition classes and a solid workout regimen. However, this debacle didn’t just unfold after the gunfire started. The DEI meltdown had been brewing well before, starting when a “girl boss” in charge made decisions that put everyone at grave risk. So, how did this horrific security breach happen? According to Kimberly A. Cheatle, the head of the Secret Service, it all boils down to a little slope on a roof.

 

The idea that the “slope” prevented the Secret Service from placing agents on the roof is an obvious lie, given what we know about the position of the counter-snipers who took out the failed assassin.

Interestingly, the shooter himself had no trouble maneuvering the “slope” and managed to fire several shots without issue, and nearly hit his target and then some. What does that say about Ms. Cheatle’s honesty, integrity, and decision-making abilities? It highlights the kind of inept, DEI-driven thinking that resulted in the shooting of a former President and a top 2024 candidate, as well as the tragic murder of an innocent fireman who died protecting his family under a hail of gunfire.

The stories emerging about the incompetence of this once highly respected organization are both stunning and deeply concerning.

However, all of this makes perfect sense when you realize what Ms. Cheatle’s core focus is for the Secret Service: DEI. It’s not about strengthening the organization or making it more formidable. It’s about shifting the focus to be more “female-focused.” Once again, the left prioritizes “firsts” and “girl power” over actually protecting people from bullets and madmen.

Libs of TikTok:

Secret Service Director a few months ago: We’re focusing on hiring more women to be more diverse.

Yesterday:

– Female agent couldn’t holster gun.

– Female agent frantically shouted “what are we doing? Where are we going?” after the shots.

The results of DEI. DEI got someone kiIIed.

What’s really scary is that Cheatle sincerely believes that the 30 long minutes it took to spot and then neutralize the shooter were “swift” and “acceptable.”

Western Journal:

And yet Cheatle — who told ABC News the “buck stops with me” — defended this response time as not only acceptable but swift.

“I don’t have all the details yet, but it was a very short period of time,” she said.

This is what happens when DEI is at the forefront of your operation—excellence takes a backseat to everything else. We’ve been covering every aspect and angle of the left’s dangerous DEI push, and what’s unfolding within the Secret Service right now is pretty much par for the course.

Revolver: 

Further down the prestige ladder, at public colleges in Republican-controlled states, a similar shift is taking place. In these states, the push is coming from Republican lawmakers, who have belatedly recognized that DEI is a hiring program for people who hate them. In some states, lawmakers have ordered universities to abolish diversity statements, but the most on-the-ball initiatives have made sure to actually fire DEI staffers and shut down their departments. At the University of Texas-Austin, forty people lost their jobs after the school’s DEI office got the axe. At the University of Florida, officials fired 13 administrators in response to a DEI ban.

The signs are all promising, to say the least. But a crucial question remains: Will all of this work?

We can hope, of course. Harvard and MIT are both trendsetters for the schools just below them on the prestige ladder. Odds are good that, at least at America’s top schools and any public college in a red state, much-hated “diversity statements” will soon be a thing of the past.

But don’t get too thrilled just yet. Abolishing diversity statements is not the same thing as abolishing the diversity cult itself. The situation in academia is improving in some respects, but for now it remains a matter of tiny marginal improvements to a vast, utterly rotten edifice. The state of affairs in academia today is such that broad swathes of entire disciplines—not just fake DEI disciplines—have become utterly corroded by DEI.

The triumphalism over vanishing diversity statements operates on the assumption that said statements are a primary driver of anti-white and anti-male discrimination in academia. In reality, though, these statements are simply the product of a DEI-obsessed culture that exists on a deeper level. Mandatory statements during the hiring process make it easier and smoother to reject white male applicants, but the intent to reject them as often as possible was there long before. This discriminatory intent means that DEI (or woke, or race communist, pick your term of choice) priorities now pervade almost every aspect of the academic sausage-making process—to a degree that would shock most Americans. Unless this process is reformed (or, more likely, torn out at the root and replaced), universities will continue their downward spiral toward useless mediocrity.

This situation underscores a crucial point: women are not suited for high-stress, high-stakes roles where split-second decisions and self-sacrifice are daily requirements. It’s one thing to be a “superwoman” in managing a household and protecting your children; it’s entirely another to throw yourself into danger like a modern-day gladiator, risking life and limb for somebody else. In that moment, shit gets far too real for women, and they understandably back down. That’s because such selfless bravery stems from what might be termed an “alpha male gene.” This isn’t a slight against women—it simply highlights our differences, which is perfectly okay. What’s not okay is subscribing to a dangerous fantasy that insists women are equal to men in every aspect, capable of doing anything a man can do. This unrealistic mindset is not just incorrect; it’s dangerous and is costing American lives.

Thankfully, now, President Trump has the all-male “A-team” protecting him.

As you can see, there’s not a female in sight. The good news is that Trump may finally have a fighting chance.

JOIN THE FIGHT — DITCH THE ADS — READ THE NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL