Yale Law Professor Jed Rubenfeld has come out with a masterful analysis of the constitutional problems surrounding the recent verdict against Trump. We encourage readers to share this analysis with friends, family, acquaintances, and anyone who doesn’t fully appreciate just what a sham the case is. There are so many layers of trickery and ridiculousness that it gets complex, and who better than a professor from the nation’s most elite law school to break it down for the general public?
The remarkable part about the first-ever conviction of a former U.S. President is that the jurors were told they didn’t even have to agree on what the crime was. Beautifully explained by my friend & former law professor @Jed_Rubenfeld. pic.twitter.com/y2Z6qBZFkN
— Vivek Ramaswamy (@VivekGRamaswamy) June 3, 2024
Among other important issues, Rubenfeld makes a convincing argument that President Trump was entitled to a Bill of Particulars in his case. Watch the whole thing:
The significance of this video, of course, extends beyond the masterful legal analysis presented. Generally speaking, there are few institutions more hostile to Trump than the legal establishment; indeed, the robust lawfare initiatives against Trump and the tremendous support they’ve received from the broader legal establishment are testament to this. All the more so, then, is it remarkable that a professor from the nation’s highest-ranked law school would take the repetitional risk to make a video laying out just what a dangerous sham the case and verdict are? For those wondering, Jed Rubenfeld is the husband of the acclaimed “Tiger Mom,” Amy Chua (also a professor at Yale Law). Of course, they have been hounded by “woke” students these past few years for being attractive, interesting, and not entirely toeing the party line. Who knows, perhaps they’ve started a trend.
Join the Discussion