Jonathan Turley Profile picture
Jun 28, 2024 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
I expect that Smith will push for a trial on the remaining counts rather than seek a superseding indictment. The court might allow it. Yet, there still remains the immunity decision for Monday. If the immunity decision is sent back, he may have ample time to seek an superseding indictment given the need for further proceedings...
...Smith has made a trial before the election an overriding priority. The court has pushed to achieve that result. However, they are fast running out of runway and this decision rips the wings off the plane for Smith in my view...
...As for the other cases, the DOJ relied heavily on obstruction but also charged trespass in many cases. That could produce problems on sentencing. Many J6 defendants were not charged with obstruction and will not be impacted...
...I expect that Smith has a plan for this eventuality. He has been here before. He was unanimously overturned by the Supreme Court in his conviction of Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell. Notably, as with today, the Court found his theory to be dangerously "boundless."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jonathan Turley

Jonathan Turley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JonathanTurley

Jun 27
...We have our second case. It is another major one: Kennedy v. Braidwood Management. supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf…
It is 6-3 in upholding the constitutionality of the board that issued rules for the covering of preventative case. This avoids a massive potential disruption on covered health care services.
...Justice Thomas dissents with Alito and Gorsuch. Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett join with the liberal justices...
Read 17 tweets
Jun 27
Buckle up . . . Just three boxes. That does not suggest long opinions with six remaining cases...
...here we go...
...we have birthright citizenship. It is written by Barrett. supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf…
Read 14 tweets
Jun 26
Five-minute warning. Once again, we have ten cases in the pipeline. We will be watching for any retirement announcements. Justices Thomas and Alito are the most obvious. Thomas may want to extend his time as one of the longest sitting justices, so the best money may be on Alito.
...Both Thomas and Alito would likely want to retire when they can be replaced with a like-minded nominee...
...Alito could well have the Mahmoud case out of Maryland on parental rights and LGBTQ material in public schools...
Read 14 tweets
Jun 22
President Trump just announced that the United States has attacked the nuclear sites in Iran, including Fordow. As discussed in today's column, Trump has history on his side in taking this action without congressional approval... thehill.com/opinion/white-…
...Since Iran has threatened to attack the United States in response to such an operation, it could trigger a series of cascading decisions. For example, under Article Five of the NATO treaty, an attack on one member is an attack on all...
...That is just one of the issues that could arise in a more prolonged conflict if Iran carries out its threat of retaliating against U.S. assets.
Read 10 tweets
Jun 20
Here we go with today's new opinions. Buckle up...
...X is back. We just got McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson with a 6-3 decision on the Hobbs Act. supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf…
...We are working up the line of seniority. That was another Kavanaugh decision...
Read 11 tweets
Jun 18
Today's decision upholding the Tennessee law restricting gender transition care for minors has enormous implications for a variety of transgender cases. Chief Justice Roberts declared "The Equal Protection Clause does not resolve these disagreements."...
...The Court rejected the use of intermediate scrutiny that was just used by a judge in Boston to bar the Trump administration from requiring either male or female designations on passports...
...There is still room here for future challenges. The Court found that there was no discrimination on the basis of transgender status and noted that "absent a showing that SB1’s prohibitions are pretexts designed to effect invidious discrimination against transgender individuals, the law does not classify on the basis of transgender status."...
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(