Glenn Greenwald
Politics • Culture • Writing
As the Daily Wire Publicly Negotiated a Debate with Candace Owens, it Secretly Sought -- and Obtained -- a Gag Order Against Her
Due to a prior restraint order against Owens, the much-anticipated Israel debate with Ben Shapiro appears to be off.
May 02, 2024
post photo preview
Daily Wire co-founder Ben Shapiro (left), and former Daily Wire host Candace Owens (right)

On April 5, Candace Owens publicly invited her former Daily Wire colleague Ben Shapiro to a debate about "Israel and the current definition of antisemitism." It was Owens' criticisms of U.S. financing of Israel, and her criticisms of Israel's war in Gaza, that caused her departure from the Daily Wire two weeks earlier.

Both Shapiro and Daily Wire CEO Jeremy Boreing responded by saying they would like to arrange the debate requested by Owens. That night, Shapiro appeared to accept her offer, writing on X: "Sure, Candace. I texted you on February 29th offering this very thing." The Daily Wire co-founder added: "Let's do it on my show this Monday at 5pm at our studios in Nashville; 90 minutes, live-streamed."

After Owens objected to the format and timing, she and Boreing exchanged several tweets in which they appeared to be negotiating, and then agreeing to, the terms and format for the debate. Owens had suggested the debate be moderated by Joe Rogan or Lex Fridman. Shaprio said he wanted no moderator. They ultimately agreed to the terms, with Boreing offering a series of conditions, including a no-moderator debate, and with Owens publicly accepting

Two weeks later, many readers of both Shapiro and Owens noticed, and complained, that the debate had not yet happened. On April 24, Owens addressed those inquiries by explaining that the Daily Wire had yet to propose dates, while reiterating her strong desire to ensure the debate happened.

But the debate was never going to happen. That is because the Daily Wire -- in secret and unbeknownst to its readers -- sought a gag order to be placed on Owens after she had called for a debate. They did this under the cover of secrecy, before a private arbitrator, at exactly the same time that they were claiming in public that they wanted this debate and were even negotiating the terms with her. To this date, the Daily Wire has not informed its readers, seeking to understand why the much-anticipated debate had not yet happened, that they had sought and obtained a gag order against Owens.

When seeking a gag order to be imposed on Owens, the Daily Wire accused her of violating the non-disparagement clause of her agreement with the company. To substantiate this accusation, the company specifically cited Owens' initial tweet requesting a debate with Shapiro as proof of this disparagement, along with concerns she voiced that Shapiro appeared to be violating the confidentiality agreement between them by publicly maligning Owens's views to explain her departure from the company. While the company claimed before the arbitrator that it did not object in principle to a "healthy debate," it urged the imposition of a gag order on Owens by claiming that the way she requested the debate constituted disparagement of Shapiro and the site.

To justify the gag order it wanted, the company also cited various criticisms of the Daily Wire and Shapiro on X that Owens had "liked." This proceeding took place as part of an exchange of legal threats between the parties after the public agreement to debate about Israel was solidified. Those threats arose from the fact that various Daily Wire executives and hosts, in both public and private, were castigating Owens as an anti-Semite. On March 22, Daily Wire host Andrew Klaven published a one-hour video that hurled multiple accusations, including anti-Semitism, at Owens. The Daily Wire cited Owens' response to that video -- her defense of herself from those multiple accusations -- as further proof that she needed to be gagged.

The initial tweet from Owens not only requested a debate, but also included a video from the popular comedian Andrew Schulz, who had mocked the Daily Wire for firing Owens over disagreements regarding Israel, and specifically mocked Shapiro for his willingness to debate only undergraduate students. The tweet underneath Owens's original debate request included a summary of Schulz's mockery of Shapiro which stated: Schulz now "realizes Ben Shapiro is only good at debating college liberals & can’t win debates against serious competition." 

After the prior restraint hearing sought by the Daily Wire and Shapiro, the arbitrator sided with them and against Owens. The arbitrator agreed with the Daily Wire that Owens' call to debate Shapiro, and her follow-up negotiations of the debate, constituted "disparagement" of the company and Shapiro. The company argued that any further attempt by Owens to debate, as well her suggesting that the debate would expose the Daily Wire's real "priorities," constituted criticisms of the site and of Shapiro, criticisms that the arbitrator concluded Owens was barred from expressing under her contract with the company.

The arbitrator thus imposed a gag order of prior restraint on Owens. Among other things, the order banned Owens from saying or doing anything in the future which could tarnish or harm the reputation of the Daily Wire and/or Ben Shapiro. Given that the Daily Wire had argued, and the arbitrator agreed, that Owens' offers to debate Shapiro about Israel and anti-semitism were themselves "disparaging," the Daily Wire has ensured that the debate with Owens that they publicly claimed to want could not, in fact, take place. Any such debate would be in conflict with the gag order they obtained on Owens from expressing any criticisms of the site or of Shapiro.

When asked for comment to be included this story, Owens replied: I "wish I could comment on this but I can’t." She added: "can neither confirm nor deny."

Boreing said: "your story is inaccurate to the point of being false," though he did not specify a single inaccuracy, nor did he deny that the Daily Wire had sought and obtained a gag order on Owens at the same time they were publicly posturing as wanting a debate with her. The confirmation we obtained of all these facts is indisputable. Boreing added: "I’m sure you can appreciate how fraught a high profile break-up like this is. For that reason, we are trying to resolve our issues with Candace privately."

It certainly seems true that the Daily Wire is attempting to achieve all of this "privately." Nonetheless, Ben Shapiro has constructed his very lucrative media brand and persona based on his supposed superiority in debating, a reputation cultivated largely as a result of numerous appearances at undergraduate schools around the country where he intrepidly engages with students who are often in their teens or early twenties. Both Shapiro and the Daily Wire have also predicated their collective media brand on an eagerness to engage in free and open debate with anyone, and to vehemently oppose any efforts to silence people, especially those in media, from expressing their political views.

It was the imperatives of this media branding that presumably led the Daily Wire and Shapiro to publicly agree to a debate with Owens over Israel and anti-semitism in the first place. Indeed, when it became apparent early after the start of Israel's war in Gaza that Owens had major differences with Shapiro, Boering responded to calls from Israel supporters for Owens to be fired by proclaiming in November: 

[E]ven if we could, we would not fire Candace because of another thing we have in common - a desire not to regulate the speech of our hosts, even when we disagree with them. Candace is paid to give her opinion, not mine or Ben’s. Unless those opinions run afoul of the law or she violates the terms of her contract in some way, her job is secure and she is welcome at Daily Wire.

But a mere four months later, Owens, despite being of one of the company's most popular hosts, was out. The company had concluded that her increasingly vocal criticisms of Israel, opposition to U.S. financing of it, and her views on anti-semitism were incompatible with the Daily Wire's policies.

All of those issues would likely have been the subject of the public debate that Owens sought, and that the Daily Wire claimed to want. Instead, the Daily Wire has succeeded in obtaining a gag order that, on its face, prevents Owens, in advance, from questioning or criticizing both the Daily Wire or Shapiro in any way.

 

 

community logo
Join the Glenn Greenwald Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
58
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Answering Your Questions About Tariffs

Many of you have been asking about the impact of Trump's tariffs, and Glenn addressed how we are covering the issue during our mail bag segment yesterday. As always, we are grateful for your thought-provoking questions! Thank you, and keep the questions coming!

00:11:10
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Breaks Down Trump's DOJ Speech on Fox News
00:04:52
In Case You Missed It: Glenn Discusses Mahmoud Khalil on Fox News
00:08:35
Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

For years, U.S. officials and their media allies accused Russia, China and Iran of tyranny for demanding censorship as a condition for Big Tech access. Now, the U.S. is doing the same to TikTok. Listen below.

Listen to this Article: Reflecting New U.S. Control of TikTok's Censorship, Our Report Criticizing Zelensky Was Deleted

Lee Fang is still delving into the breathtaking corruption surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and his activities in the Virgin Islands. "What is clear, however, is that an attorney who worked to protect Epstein's estate is now the chief law enforcement officer of the U.S. Virgin Islands."
https://www.leefang.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-exploited-the-us?r=1ngpds&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false

There are a couple of posts referring to events GG is, I am guessing, participating in. One in Scottsdale, AZ and another in Seattle, WA. It would be great if GG or a member of the SU team could post places, times, and dates prior to when GG is taking part in a live event. Would be very nice to see him in person, speaking in a different forum/formate. Thanks

WTF is wrong with the United States Supreme Court? They just declined to hear the case of a Massachusetts school prohibiting a student from wearing a t-shirt reading "There Are Only Two Genders" while school staff/administration encouraged and endorsed student expression advocating the view point of multiple genders. What a group of absolute cowards!! So what can be construed by this decision from the Court is 'fuck the 1st amendment and free speech.' Guess free speech is relative under the rule of law. Watch out all who don't fall in line with the opinions of the Court!

post photo preview
Israeli Embassy Staffers Killed in DC: Reactions and Implications; DHS Terminates Student Visas for Harvard
System Update #459

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXfcYT5sdGmVLltipdFhEKNx-tKcG4RtBuekCqT7nOGEwVsJOZeJfOXB4yqzlpdkJeFMjxVfMnXT2NnjpyMDg57UVGTYZXPBJjxHSU2zumHCkZ9ht4hP1AGbOFUw1IMHV-PEkkTB56JjS9gTRkvLJFk?key=MF3jYdUEH_qFY9YzD4x8OQ

There's a lot to talk about because a cold-blooded murder happened last night on the streets of Washington, D.C., as a gunman apparently targeted people associated with an event held at the Capital Jewish Museum, where the American Jewish Committee was hosting a reception for young diplomats. The two victims, a couple in their mid-20s, soon to be engaged, were both staffers at the Israeli embassy in Washington. The shooter left behind a manifesto stating he was doing it, killing people, to protest Israel's ongoing destruction of Gaza, and he yelled pro-Palestinian slogans, including “Free Palestine,” once he was arrested. 

It goes without saying, or at least it should, that randomly targeting people you don't know for murder is morally unjust in all cases, regardless of the justness of the cause in whose name you're doing it. But the reaction to this violence predictably lurched very quickly. We'll look at all the ramifications and the attempts to use these killings for various agendas. 

Then, the Department of Homeland Security announced today that it was immediately revoking all international student visas for Harvard, forcing all students to try to find another school or face deportation from the United States. All of this comes as the Irish rap band Kneecaps has been formally charged with terrorism crimes by the U.K. government – terrorism crimes – for featuring a sign at one of their shows in support of Gaza and against Israel, as well as using images of Hezbollah in their show. As global public opinion grows against Israel, threatening to make it, in the words of an Israeli official, a "pariah state", the censorship campaign and the efforts to suppress Israel's criticisms become more severe and more desperate every day. 

AD_4nXfcYT5sdGmVLltipdFhEKNx-tKcG4RtBuekCqT7nOGEwVsJOZeJfOXB4yqzlpdkJeFMjxVfMnXT2NnjpyMDg57UVGTYZXPBJjxHSU2zumHCkZ9ht4hP1AGbOFUw1IMHV-PEkkTB56JjS9gTRkvLJFk?key=MF3jYdUEH_qFY9YzD4x8OQ

AD_4nXdiH_4umh20uNlJqmIlDhbKpVB2Y9bhP1hBhs--wZKrpCE9MBnlCCJIR1ea7I4HtY9RHHaXwoMCv8_TFyl_4POD0Ylqb2IytT0W0bRzMOdpJlR1FdFc1n_xqBXBgZpCORbl_4-arxgfcWzEYPELrw?key=MF3jYdUEH_qFY9YzD4x8OQ

What happened last night in Washington, D.C., by all appearances, and we should definitely wait for more investigations and for facts to unfold because often things aren't what they appear to be in the first day or week, but by all appearance it seems as though somebody very committed to the cause of protesting the Israeli destruction of Gaza, the Israeli ethnic cleansing in Gaza, and the Israeli genocide in Gaza decided that, even though the world is starting to realize what's going on, even though the U.S. government itself understands that the population is turning against it, that there's simply nothing that will be done to stop the slaughter of Palestinians by Israel – based on some very twisted moral reasoning, that he thought it was justified and helpful – to randomly gun down too young Americans with ties to Israel although he presumably didn't even know they had ties to Israel at the time that he did it. 

It was a couple that was going to be engaged when they went to Israel next week, She was Jewish, grew up in a Jewish family, had very strong ties to Isreal, had often gone there but when she would go there, she would work on with the groups that try to bridge gaps between Israelis and Palestinians to kind of create dialog between the two, to try to encourage peaceful coexistence. 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
JD Vance: Does SCOTUS Have the Power to Reject the Majority's Will?; The Lingering Epstein Question: Did he Work with Foreign Intel Agencies?; Key Zelenskyy Opponent Murdered in Spain and More
System Update #458

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXfotgeBosjgEZdbQ56WSs91FuUnOTmDWXyXhjOUf-tp7kF2G0drQV-TLLjm09DoYQfMLDlZNzcf2HFFKgPWBVXv6zP4ahmwtvxGWu8_i9BS4VL1wNk_LOWsHcSsvqg6t1q_avrJn37OWTsFOFJHsw?key=92TFSBWGGk558txoKvO-yw

We want to cover multiple stories in a more rapid-fire style than we normally do, beginning with comments that Vice President JD Vance made today in an interview with the NYT's Ross Douthat. When asked about rulings that courts have been issuing against the Trump administration, placing limits on the administration's actions regarding immigration, Vance accused courts of seeking to impede what most Americans said they favored during the election.

In our second story, the current FBI Director Kash Patel and his deputy, Dan Bongino, surprised many people, in a recent interview on Fox stating in the most matter of fact and I would say awkward way that they are 100% certain that Jeffrey Epstein did in fact commit suicide in prison, that nobody killed him. Okay, that's possible. However, the far bigger and still unanswered question about this entire Epstein matter remains oddly unanswered, namely, did Jeffrey Epstein work for or with any foreign intelligence agencies? Why can't we know the answers to that, given the administration has promised full transparency on the Epstein files? 

Then, Jake Tapper continues his humiliation tour, trying to justify how he and others like him in the media can still possibly pretend that they did not know about Biden's cognitive decline, even while most Americans do. We also have several short items regarding Brazil, including the testimony that Mark Rubio gave today in Congress, which are as hilarious and pathetic as they are consequential. We wanted to share those with you.

AD_4nXfotgeBosjgEZdbQ56WSs91FuUnOTmDWXyXhjOUf-tp7kF2G0drQV-TLLjm09DoYQfMLDlZNzcf2HFFKgPWBVXv6zP4ahmwtvxGWu8_i9BS4VL1wNk_LOWsHcSsvqg6t1q_avrJn37OWTsFOFJHsw?key=92TFSBWGGk558txoKvO-yw

AD_4nXdDxJthDjJJQ9X7D6j_QWLoB1ZOmr5vW_d4xWXNpBfqS2lIgWR-SIStnfF3RnaB5qW-izKrL_VIIszUGUcQa0jDX2Qhfs6F3V_HzOvsHqWIxF_Mdx1-pqpfUvzLsmBYyy5YRgHcrVUXCahcbR2mqQ?key=92TFSBWGGk558txoKvO-yw

All right, so there's been, of course, a series of judicial rulings which have been adverse to the administration almost from the very beginning, after Donald Trump was inaugurated, first coming from federal district courts, then appellate courts, and after that, from even the Supreme Court. While the narrative has been that these are all leftist activists, judges trying to commandeer American policy independent of the election, the reality is that a lot of the judges who have ruled against the Trump administration aren't just conservative judges, but Trump-appointed judges in many cases. 

The Supreme Court twice ruled 9-0 against the Trump Administration: one in the question of whether people being deported under the Alien Enemies Act have the right of habeas corpus – all nine justices in the Supreme Court said they did – and then also on the Abrego Garcia case where the government admitted that they accidentally or mistakenly deported him given the immigration hold that had been placed on him and the Supreme Court said, the government must do everything it can to facilitate his release and that's going back to the court, based on the apparent decision by the Trump administration to do nothing to try to facilitate it.

It's not true that these are left-wing judges. Many of them are the most beloved conservative judges and the most beloved Trump-appointed justices throughout the federal system. A Trump-appointed district court judge ruled that Trump can't even invoke the Alien Enemies Act, to begin with, because we're not at war, as the statute envisioned it. That has been upheld by an appellate court, too. 

Vice President JD Vance gave an interview, published today, to the New York Times columnist Ross Douthat. They talk about a lot of things, including the new Pope, Catholicism. I always think JD Vance is a very smart and interesting figure. We'll see that even more, I think, once he is no longer the Vice President but will presumably run for president on his own, and then he's not as bound by the Trump administration and their policies. Obviously, no vice president can come out and contradict the president; it's really not their job to do that, but still, he does speak openly and often expresses his ideas very coherently. 

He said something today with Ross Douthat about these court rulings, including from the Supreme Court, that I think is very notable because it's a very tendentious argument, if not a false argument, about how our American founding, how the system of government was created. JD Vance went to Yale Law School. He understands the law extremely well. So, let's just take a look at this part of the conversation: 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Israel Pretends to Let Food into Gaza as More Allies Condemn Atrocities; Witkoff Proposes Impossible Iran Deal Red Line; Biden's Cancer Diagnosis Raises More Cover-Up Questions
System Update #457

The following is an abridged transcript from System Update’s most recent episode. You can watch the full episode on Rumble or listen to it in podcast form on Apple, Spotify, or any other major podcast provider.  

System Update is an independent show free to all viewers and listeners, but that wouldn’t be possible without our loyal supporters. To keep the show free for everyone, please consider joining our Locals, where we host our members-only aftershow, publish exclusive articles, release these transcripts, and so much more!

AD_4nXcGSfT-hMtArbi33a3CITh1gAKtcb5b4JPIv4i2LVVGzaxYcvM7UDiJbej_KvBsJLRV3oBMLTxE2hLDEE6F4ohCrz8PWBQR4chA3M4AYTdFR2VV2Su9Q2J9mpj-nbyNsPFQbzj59ojJmTnFEx_DQ2k?key=aDI3T1CDuOpLU1S3aLGUOg

The Israeli government is finally recognizing that the world is becoming repulsed by what it is doing. Indeed, long-time supporters of Israel, media, politics and government, are now denouncing that state's atrocities. As a result, the Israeli government today announced that it would allow some humanitarian aid to enter Gaza – though when doing so, it said explicitly that the amount of food they allow in will be minimal, and that they are only doing it, this is their words, because the world won't allow them to proceed to their final solution, destroying all of Gaza and then expelling Palestinians from the Gaza Strip or putting them into camps. 

Then, when it comes to an attack on Iran, there have long been two camps inside the Trump administration: one that does not want a deal with Iran but rather wants a war, and the other that wants a deal to avert a war. Given how many times Trump has made clear that he is determined to get a deal, the strategy of the war hawks is never to simply come right out and oppose a deal because that would make Trump feel alienated. Their strategy, instead, is to put conditions on the deal. 

And then, finally, Joe Biden's team issued a statement yesterday announcing that he has advanced an aggressive prostate cancer that has already metastasized to his bones. Democrats are despicable, exploiting the announcement of that illness to demand that everyone immediately stop talking about the 2024 cover-up that they perpetrated on the nation, because it's in bad taste to pursue that scandal now that   Biden is sick. We'll examine all that and tell you about the latest. 

AD_4nXcGSfT-hMtArbi33a3CITh1gAKtcb5b4JPIv4i2LVVGzaxYcvM7UDiJbej_KvBsJLRV3oBMLTxE2hLDEE6F4ohCrz8PWBQR4chA3M4AYTdFR2VV2Su9Q2J9mpj-nbyNsPFQbzj59ojJmTnFEx_DQ2k?key=aDI3T1CDuOpLU1S3aLGUOg

AD_4nXcnMTUWc_h75THU8NH4N4QAS2unDjGjYYL8JizGu33JKGSp-IIpBT9jq-7rkiABYWJJEkTHMM6JhFgN7tWParCxiU55GfLunIsQ2e-s1sirjBcG2-2BQbazbTN-3lRXmHxZMReX4kjSR6oxHtII?key=aDI3T1CDuOpLU1S3aLGUOg

Something extremely cynical and I would even say repugnant is currently going on with Israel's war on Gaza. Now that's been true for quite some time, but every now and then they go an extra distance to be morally repellent in a way that you previously didn't expect that they would do and that's certainly been the case for the events of yesterday. 

The Israeli government has seen a reversal in all sorts of prior allies, people who have long supported Israel and everything they've done, who have defended the war in Gaza, are now suddenly saying, “Wait a minute, this has gone way too far. I don't want to be associated with this anymore” and suddenly, they are even admitting things like, “Oh, I made a mistake in supporting it.” Major Western outlets and Western governments, even people inside the Trump administration, are now saying that, “Sorry, but mass famine, deliberate starvation of two million people, half of whom are children, that's not something we're going to stand by and watch.” 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals