Join the fight and contribute to our war chest

Ditch the ads for $5 per month or $49 per year

Let this serve as a warning to everyone. Straying from the sanctioned uni-party script is off-limits. Whether you’re advocating for peace or presenting an alternate viewpoint, it’s a no-go zone. And if you dare to wander off track, like Tucker Carlson often does—remember his Vladimir Putin interview?—you’ll find yourself in the crosshairs of the Deep State’s goon squad, including wannabe enforcers like “tough guy” Dan Crenshaw, who hasn’t met an insider stock deal or a potential war that he didn’t love.

That’s precisely what unfolded recently when Tucker boldly interviewed a Christian Palestinian pastor from Bethlehem, aiming to offer conservatives a fresh viewpoint. The instant Tucker stepped out of line and challenged the uni-party narrative, chaos ensued, and Dan Crenshaw nearly lost it, making a mad dash to the closest smart device to vent his fury.

Sasha Stone:

In a recent episode, Tucker Carlson engaged in a thought-provoking discussion with a Palestinian pastor from Bethlehem on his show, focusing on the treatment of Christians in Israel. The interview aimed to shed light on the challenges faced by Palestinian Christians, one of the oldest Christian communities in the world, and to raise awareness among American Christians, particularly evangelicals, about the realities they face under the Israeli government and society. This conversation has sparked significant interest and discussion on social media, with many expressing their support for the exposure of this issue.

Joel Pollak, a senior editor at Breitbart and a proud Jewish man, had quite a bit to say about Tucker’s interview. It’s safe to say he was not impressed:

Allow me to respond to @TuckerCarlson ‘s interview here with @MuntherIsaac by talking about the facts, rather than speculating about whether Tucker hates Israel, or is an antisemite. He says he is concerned about Christians; I’ll accept that. But there’s no excuse for this. (1/nn)

First, a fact about Bethlehem. Christians used to be a majority there; they are now a minority. The Palestinian Authority has been Islamizing the city since taking control of Bethlehem 30 years ago. Israeli “occupation” is hardly the primary issue.(2/10)

Another fact: Bethlehem has become an antisemitic city under Palestinian control, far worse to Jews than even to Christians. In 2007, I was told not to speak Hebrew there; in 2023, I was told to remove my yarmulke, or cover it with a hat. In the birthplace of Jesus, a Jew. (3/10)

Rev. Isaac does not believe Israel should exist, a fact Tucker does not discuss. He also repeats many false claims about Israel’s war against Hamas in Gaza, like the claim Israeli snipers killed 2 civilians in a church, which the IDF (which admits other mistakes) refuted. (4/10)

Remarkably, Rev. Isaac criticizes the Abraham Accords, a peace agreement between Israel and several Arab states. One who is truly interested in peace should welcome that development. For Rev. Isaac, that peace deal is bad because it distracts from the Palestinian struggle. (5/10)

Rev. Isaac is an activist who campaigns worldwide against evangelical Christian support for Israel. He tells Carlson evangelicals should not use the Bible as a basis for supporting Israel. He is entitled to these beliefs but they are not authoritative in any broader sense. (6/10)

Rev. Isaac says Israel is “not as free as people say” for Christians, claiming it is tough to register conversions. (Bureaucracy is tough for everyone in Israel, due to laws dating to the Ottoman era.) Tucker extrapolates, falsely, Christians have “fewer rights” in Israel. (7/10)

Carlson adds some of the interview’s most incendiary comments, suggesting that the U.S. should not give Israel aid if one Christian is killed and should not support a foreign government that he says is guilty of “blowing up churches and killing Christians,” which is false. (8/10)

One suspects Carlson’s real target is Republican foreign policy. He mocks “self-professed Christians” in the U.S. whom he says are “sending money to oppress Christians,” another false and inflammatory statement. He attacks evangelical @SpeakerJohnson for supporting Israel. (9/10)

There are many pro-Israel Christian Arabs (tak to @YosephHaddad). Concern about Christians would suggest backing Israel against Islamist Hamas and opposing Palestinian Authority policies. Tucker has taken his opposition to a U.S. role in foreign wars to an absurd extreme. (10/10)

Here’s what RINO Dan Crenshaw had to say in response to Joel’s post and Tucker’s interview, absurdly labeling Tucker a “click-chaser” and tossing around profanity in a bid to come off as a “tough guy”:

This is who Tucker is: a click-chaser.

Tucker’s MO is simple: defend America’s enemies and attack America’s allies. There isn’t an objective bone left in that washed up news host’s body. Mindless contrarianism is his guiding principle, buttressed by his childish tactic to “juSt aSK quEsTiOns!”

But any educated adult, especially one with such a long career in journalism, should occasionally try *answering* some of those questions objectively.

But he never does. Instead, he uses his platform to sow doubt and paranoia and false narratives.

He does this for one simple reason: clicks and engagement, which of course translate to monetary benefit. He wants you to believe he is the last place you can go to for truth, that he’s the ONLY one brave enough to reveal the elitist lies being told.

This nonsense about Christian mistreatment in Israel is just the latest example.

Tucker will eventually fade into nothingness, because his veneer of faux intellectualism is quickly falling apart and revealing who he truly is: a cowardly, know-nothing elitist who is full of shit.

Crenshaw’s reaction seemed laced with jealousy and insecurity, especially given Tucker’s success and popularity.

Dan’s exaggerated and misplaced anger also has a tinge of drama you’d expect to see from a jilted young girl, discarded like yesterday’s trash. Needless to say, his attempt to take a swing at Tucker resulted in him spinning in circles and then falling flat on his RINO face. Here’s what folks online had to say about Deep State Dan’s neocon tantrum:

“Shut up, warmonger RINO.”

“America-last war pig sellout says what?”

“Dude everyone, and I mean everyone in Texas hates you!”

“This is who Dan Crenshaw is: A piece of shit.”

“Says the guy who’s selling out our country.. you are so pathetic”

“Dan Crenshaw is the male version of Liz Cheney.”

“You are repulsive. No matter what you say to drag Tucker, everyone still hates you. You have failed your constituents, repeatedly.”

“Are you for real? I know that Texas election was rigged.”

“You’re nothing but a cog in the establishment machine. You’re no different than Adam Schiff”

“Crenshaw is compromised and a traitor.”

“Dan Crenshaw steals form mom and pop’s retirement funds via insider trading. He votes to give the intel community the right to spy on Americans. What will history books say about him?”

“Dan Crenshaw is the Adam Kinzinger of Liz Cheney’s.”

“Sir you almost got into a fist fight with a teenager when she said you weren’t a real Christian”

Speaking of grifters and Dan’s alleged “insider trading,” he’s making quite the haul. No surprise, he’s digging his claws into Congress. Dan’s stumbled upon the classic “swamp” method to line his and his family’s pockets.

Image

Honestly, it seems like Dan is still steaming mad because Tucker called him out back in March when he foolishly said on camera that the intelligence community officials who lied through their teeth about Hunter’s laptop to boost Biden’s election chances weren’t a big deal since they were “retired.” What Dan left out was that a whopping five of those so-called “experts” who bald-facedly lied to the American people were actually former CIA directors.

Great job, Dan.

Here’s what Tucker had to say in that March X post:

This is Rep. Dan Crenshaw as he walks out of the Capitol after voting to give Joe Biden the power to shut down news sites that dare to challenge him. Crenshaw tells reporter Liam Cosgrove that U.S. intel agencies don’t meddle in domestic news coverage, when of course he knows that’s untrue. Watch his face as he says it. Liar.

The only “mistake” Tucker made was daring to think outside the box, showing Americans there’s another side to the story, and presenting an alternate viewpoint. You’d think in America, that kind of initiative would be applauded, but sadly, that’s not who we are anymore. Nowadays, we live in a country seemingly ruled by a single party, where one set of rules is supposed to apply to everyone. Yet, the moment you go against the grain, you’re labeled public enemy number one by Deep State operatives like Dan Crenshaw.

JOIN THE FIGHT — DITCH THE ADS — READ THE NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL