Join the fight and contribute to our war chest

Ditch the ads for $5 per month or $49 per year

There’s a full-blown witch hunt against anyone with a bit of clout who dares say the 2020 election was a sham. Meanwhile, Americans are once again rejecting what the regime is selling, calling 2020 the “fairest election in the land.” Just look at this Axios poll from a couple of years ago—it showed over 40 percent of Americans doubted Biden’s legit win. You can bet that number was actually way higher then, and it’s skyrocketed now, especially with Biden’s less-than-stellar track record and the hard-to-ignore signs of his senility, which, let’s be honest, has only gotten more noticeable over the last four years.

This is from Rasmussen:


Back in 2020, Joe told us what would happen.

Trump-supporting attorney John Eastman was recently disbarred over the sham 2020 election and his fight for the truth. The sad part is that he’s not the only one who will likely face this weaponized, political assault.


LAWFARE: Ex-Trump Election Lawyer John Eastman Has Been Disbarred. More than a hundred lawyers who represented Trump are facing similar fights – Democrats want to prevent Republicans from having access to the courts prior to November.

Mike Benz, the executive director of the Foundation for Freedom Online, responded with fire and fury to this unjust, immoral, and anti-American decision against John Eastman, and he’s right.


You’ve got to hand it to the Dems; when they target their opponents, they go all in. Meanwhile, Republicans seem to be tiptoeing around, scared of their own shadows. When this whole political hit job began, Revolver was right there, highlighting the risks Mr. Eastman and others are up against.


Remember the shenanigans of the 2020 election? The mail-in vote flooding, the late night ballot-counting, the illegal last-minute modifications of election procedures? As we gear up for another election year, the powers-that-be have decided that the matter is closed and it’s time to forget all that. They even have ways of making you forget.

Now there are several new advocacy groups funded by millions in “dark money” dedicated to shutting down any lawyer involved in shedding light on election issues. Groups like the 65 Project and States United Democracy Center staffed by the usual crew of longtime Democrat party activists and RINO never-Trumpers are looking to bury concerned lawyers under a mountain of official complaints. Their stated tactics are disbarments, “making them toxic in their communities and in their own firms” and destroying their careers. It’s explicitly personal, right out of the Saul Alinsky playbook. If they can destroy anyone who officially investigates the integrity of our elections, they can keep using the same bag of tricks that worked for them in 2020 forever.

The result is a massive chilling effect on the practice of election law and the loss of the profession entirely.

Today there’s one man speaking out. John Eastman is a constitutional scholar who, through his long career, has clerked at the Supreme Court, served as an attorney at Kirkland & Ellis where he specialized in constitutional litigation, taught constitutional law at Chapman University in California, and served as dean of the school. In 2020 he helped President Trump evaluate issues arising from the 2020 election and has been involved in election integrity efforts since then. Now the Democrat lawfare machine has him in their sights. On Tuesday this week he went before the State Bar of California to defend himself against disbarment, a trial engineered by the activist States United Democracy Center who filed complaints against him. He also faces a bar complaint filed against him with SCOTUS by the 65 Project.

These are unfortunately just the beginning of his troubles. He’s also been approached by the FBI at the behest of the January 6th committee, even though he was nowhere near the Capitol on that day. He’s had his address printed in local newspapers and radical activists picket his house on a daily basis. They have even set spikes in his gravel driveway to damage the cars of his family and visitors, thrown dog feces at his house, and graffiti’d his street to direct more protestors to his home.

But every now and then, the good guys land some wins against these tyrannical lunatics. A perfect example happened recently with Garland Favarito, co-founder of “Voter GA.” During the Eastman hearing, he dropped his audit findings on the ODC prosecutor in a way they never saw coming, leading to one of the most epic cross-examination flops in history.

This is a fundamental rule in law: never ask a question unless you already know the answer.

Declare Your Ballot:

This might be the greatest cross-examination failure of all time! The ODC prosecutor is challenging Garland Favorito to list examples of actual fraud and not just potential fraud. Rule #1 – don’t ask a question you don’t know the answer to. Garland starts to go through all the evidence of actual fraud. Garland is so persuasive at the end of it the ODC prosecutor screws up and calls the Secretary of State a “CORRUPT ONE!” Rule #2 – Don’t agree with the witness the election was stolen! Trump won, Biden cheated – as now even the ODC agrees SoS Brad Ratsperjurer is a corrupt one!

Thanks to Favaorito’s in-depth analysis, it appears that Biden likely stole the election in Georgia, and if he did it there, what are the chances that he did it elsewhere?

Military Times: 

In addition to Wingate’s testimony, journalist Rachel Alexander tweeted that Garland Favorito, co-founder of VoterGA, shared his audit of the Fulton County election as part of Clark’s disbarment trial. Alexander reported that Favorito’s audit discovered a 60% error rate in election results matching ballot images.

“Tally sheet totals didn’t match the ballot images. Found falsified tally sheets – 100 to nothing for Biden,” Alexander stated. “Some were 200 to nothing, a technical impossibility. Whereas the ballot images showed a 60-40 ratio of Biden to Trump.”

It’s not like we’re all in the dark about the massive 2020 election fraud; it’s more about our elites and crooked judges steering clear of the issue, not wanting to go near it with a 10-foot pole. And to make matters more obvious, the regime loyalists are in a mad, desperate frenzy to silence any discussion about cheating.

Also, to add insult to injury to the “2020 was a fair election” crowd, Mark Wingate explained why he voted against certifying the sham 2020 election.

Kanekoa the Great:

NEW: Mark Wingate, a Fulton County Elections Board member, testifies that he voted against certifying the 2020 election because the county did not verify the signatures on 147,000 mail-in ballots.

“I asked what did we do for signature verification? And the comment I got back frankly floored me, ‘We didn’t do any.'”

Additionally, the county could not provide any chain of custody documentation or surveillance footage for mail-in ballots or ballot drop boxes.

“I and other board members had requested that we obtain the chain of custody documentation from the department and none of that was ever delivered.”

“There was never any surveillance tape, an inch of footage delivered to the board.”

He also says there were problems with the voter registration rolls that still exist in Fulton County.

Wingate’s testimony was part of the disbarment hearing for Former United States Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark, who is among the 19 defendants facing various charges, including racketeering, by Fani Willis for investigating the 2020 election in Fulton County.

At this point, can we just assume that those illegal mail-in ballots were safely stored in the mystery suitcases that magically showed up right after the phony water main break? It’s a total miscarriage of justice that Mr. Eastman got targeted in what’s meant to be the land of the free, but these days, it’s starting to feel more like the land of the oppressed. And Mike Benz hit the nail on the head—it’s time to toughen up and adopt an “eye for an eye” strategy against these Dems because it seems like that’s the only language they understand.