Join the fight and contribute to our war chest

Ditch the ads for $5 per month or $49 per year

Canada is lost. For a real-time example of communism hitting its stride, just look at what’s unfolding with the Canadian government’s latest actions—tyranny personified. They’re pushing a law that’s nothing short of draconian, allowing them to confine citizens to their homes on mere “suspicion” of potential future hate crimes. What this bill essentially does is put an end to free speech online, setting a sinister, tyrannical precedent that other countries might be tempted to follow, aiming to quash free speech and silence political dissent. Trudeau’s latest move uses “protecting kids” and championing “democracy” as justifications for destroying your rights. What’s truly alarming is how many Americans will eventually embrace this kind of tyranny. A large portion of our population is eager to have Big Brother’s boot on their necks. Constitutional lawyers in Canada are already raising red flags galore about this new bill, signaling a dire warning that freedom on the internet could be at stake for Canadians—and potentially, the rest of the world.

LifeSiteNews:

A top constitutional lawyer warned that the federal government’s Online Harms Act to further regulate the internet will allow a new digital safety commission to conduct “secret commission hearings” against those found to have violated the new law, raising “serious concerns for the freedom of expression” of Canadians online.

Marty Moore, who serves as the litigation director for the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms-funded Charter Advocates Canada, told LifeSiteNews on Tuesday that Bill C-63 will allow for the “creation of a new government agency with a broad mandate to promote ‘online safety’ and target ‘harmful content.’”

“The use of the term ‘safety’ is misleading, when the government through Bill C-63 is clearly seeking to censor expression simply based on its content, and not on its actual effect,” he told LifeSiteNews.

Moore noted that the bill will also “open doors for government regulation to target undefined psychological harm.”

The new government bill was introduced Monday by Justice Minister Arif Virani in the House of Commons and passed its first reading.

Bill C-63 will create the Online Harms Act and modify existing laws, amending the Criminal Code as well as the Canadian Human Rights Act, in what the Liberals under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau claim will target certain cases of internet content removal, notably those involving child sexual abuse and pornography.

Details of the new legislation to regulate the internet show the bill could lead to more people jailed for life for “hate crimes” or fined $50,000 and jailed for posts that the government defines as “hate speech” based on gender, race, or other categories.

The bill calls for the creation of a digital safety commission, a digital safety ombudsperson, and the digital safety office.

This “digital ombudsperson” will be responsible for monitoring online behavior and holding people “accountable.” The Lifesite piece goes on:

He said that while the Commission’s reach is “only vaguely undefined,” it would have the power to regulate anyone who operates a “social media service” that “has a yet-to-be-designated number of users or is “deemed a regulated service by the government without regard to the number of users.”

According to the Trudeau government, Bill C-63 aims to protect kids from online harms and crack down on non-consensual deep-fake pornography involving children and will target seven types of online harms, such as hate speech, terrorist content, incitement to violence, the sharing of non-consensual intimate images, child exploitation, cyberbullying and inciting self-harm.

The left has a pattern of pulling the “kids” and “democracy” cards to back up their aggressive anti-freedom moves. That’s the direction this bill is taking—opening doors to warrants, secretive hearings, and hefty fines. Yet, what’s truly alarming about this bill is the part where they can detain you based on the suspicion that you might commit a hate crime down the road. The Canadian government stands by this, arguing it’s a preventive measure against radicalization and the spread of harmful ideologies online.

Russell Brand knows that the West is lost. We’re no longer free.

And just in case you didn’t realize it, the people who want to bulldoze your freedoms are not the good guys. Here’s what folks online are saying about this new move:

“How do we deradicalize the people who are learning things from the MSM?”

“He’s just radicalized me more. How is this possible?”

“The way he is speaking seems pretty radical to me.”

“Well, considering he’s doing obstruction of justice as we speak let’s start with him”

“The person is sick. You cannot explain this behaviour any other way. Evil is too soft.”

“A life sentence for hurt feelings; sounds like a Liberal plan.”

Sure, because there’s nothing like charging people with crimes they might commit in the future to really “deradicalize” them. This is the direction the globalist agenda is steering towards. When persuasion fails, intimidation becomes the strategy of choice. This tactic is already at play in the US—just take a look at the treatment of the J6 detainees. It’s a clear signal from our government: step out of line with the official regime narrative, and your life is over.

Welcome to the “reeducation camp” phase of the globalist playbook.

JOIN THE FIGHT — DITCH THE ADS — READ THE NEWSFEED — FOLLOW ON X — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL