Clicky

Join the pushback against online censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance.

Biden Administration Urges Supreme Court To Overturn Ban on Federal Agencies Influencing Tech Censorship

Biden wants the Supreme Court to support its censorship efforts.

If youโ€™re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed an injunction against federal agencies to stop the current White House from colluding with Big Techโ€™s social media.

And now, the Biden Administration is going to the US Supreme Court in a last-ditch attempt to reverse this decision.

The big picture effect โ€“ or at least, the intended meaning โ€“ of the Fifth Circuit ruling was to stop the government from working with Big Tech in censoring online content.

Thereโ€™s little surprise that this doesnโ€™t sit well with that government, which now hopes that the federal appellate courtโ€™s decision can be overturned.

The White House says the ruling is banning its โ€œgoodโ€ work done alongside social media to combat โ€œmisinformationโ€; instead of admitting its actions to amount to collusion with Big Tech โ€“ which has been amply documented now, not least by the Twitter Files โ€“ the government insists its actions are serving the public, and its โ€œabilityโ€ to discuss relevant issues.

We obtained a copy of the petition for you here.

US Surgeon General Vivek Murthy is back again here โ€“ to say that what those now in power in the US (a message amplified by legacy media) did ahead of the 2020 presidential election, as well as subsequently regarding the pandemic โ€œmisinformationโ€ โ€“ which is now fairly widely accepted to be censorship (โ€œmoderationโ€) โ€“ is what Murthy still calls, justified.

By what, though? Because the appellate courtโ€™s ruling looked into the governmentโ€™s โ€œpersuasive actionsโ€ (and no, youโ€™re not reading a line from a gangster movie script, where โ€œcoercionโ€ is spelled as, โ€œurgingโ€, etc.).

In any case, the appellate court found these actions were in fact coercive and unconstitutional.

Well, Murthy believes the court got it all wrong. The Fifth Circuit is accused of โ€œimproperly applying new and unprecedentedโ€ remedies. (No โ€“ he was not talking about the Covid vaccine(s). The reference was to the courtโ€™s allegedly flawed โ€œlegal theoriesโ€).

Murthy and other administration representatives are telling the Supreme Court that what the Fifth Circuit found to be unconstitutional, was actually โ€œlawful persuasive governmental actions.โ€

The โ€œgrandโ€ argument here is that, historically, US governments have been using free speech as a vehicle to promote their policies. And so โ€“ why would this case of โ€œurgingโ€ Big Tech be any different?

โ€œThe Biden administrationโ€™s urging of social media platforms to enforce their content moderation policies to combat misinformation and disinformation is no different,โ€ the government said.

If youโ€™re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.

Logo with a red shield enclosing a stylized globe and three red arrows pointing upward to the right, next to the text 'RECLAIM THE NET' with 'RECLAIM' in gray and 'THE NET' in red

Join the pushback against online censorship, cancel culture, and surveillance.

Reclaim The Net Logo

Defend free speech and individual liberty online.