Of course the Biden Admin is going to appeal the order barring them from pressuring Big Tech to censor for them.
Silencing and censoring dissent is the primary instrument of the left-liberal establishment. They and their supporters will fight to the grave to protect it.
Absolutely hilarious: here's how NPR -- in a *news article*, in its headline -- describes the court ruling barring the FBI and WH from pressuring Big Tech to censor for them.
"Journalists" don't even hide the fact that, like most liberals, they favor state censorship online:
The NYT drags out the fraudulent industry -- "disinformation experts" -- to tell their readers how scared and angry they should be that the Biden Admin can no longer use the FBI and WH to pressure Big Tech to censor for them.
The experts are "fretting": 😨
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That massive war spending harmed Americans' quality of life was once so clear it needed no debate.
Now, this neoliberal rag just accused RFK Jr, myself and others of being - all together now - "Kremlin propagandists" for arguing it. We'll discuss this.
The NYT - which has steadfastly supported Biden's proxy war in Ukraine and the $100 billion for it - just warned Americans the country is drowning in debt and they need to prepare for cuts to Social Security and Medicaid. No mention of war spending:
This NYT article is so remarkable: it now praises as Vital to Our Safety the NSA's domestic warantless spying program that the NYT itself exposed in 2005, but also:
Admits the "new generation" of the GOP opposes US Security State powers, while new Dems revere the CIA/NSA/FBI:
This is the radical change in US politics that most establishment liberals and corporate media figures can't see.
It's what explains why Dems are in bed with neocons; why they revere the US Security State; and why they defend an online censorship regime run by DHS, CIA and FBI.
In fact, Democrats overwhelmingly favor corporate censorship of the internet as well as government censorship of the internet, all in the name of combating "disinformation."
Imagine trusting tech billionaires and the FBI/CIA to decree truth and falsity.
Hello, @SenMarkey: when it comes to Big Tech censorship of the internet, is it the view of the Democratic Party that they are censoring too much political speech, or that they are censoring too little?
Yet again: the liberal media and political establishment are now drooling, devoted loyalists of the US Security State.
They cheer spying domestic programs they once indignantly denounced, and suggest only traitors and fascists want to limit FBI/NSA spying authorities.🤷♂️
That said, there are also some Dems - including Sens. @ossoff and @DickDurbin -- who are demanding reforms and limits to these spying powers before the law is renewed.
But long-standing left-liberal causes - free speech, civil liberties, etc. - now coded as "hard-right" views.
In the pantheon of neocon monsters and sociopaths, Elliott Abrams resides in the top tier: supporting death squads, criminally concealing evidence, cheerleading every war from a safe distance.
It's also completely unsurprising that Biden chose him for this position:
The reason the DC bipartisan foreign policy class has trained liberal imbeciles like this one to focus obsessively on the bad acts of faraway foreign governments is to prevent them from focusing on the monsters and criminals empowered by Biden: