MAGA is fighting back against the mob and so are we… but we need your help. Join our growing army and click here to subscribe to Revolver. Or give the gift of Revolver—simply select the annual subscription and select “This is a gift” on the next page. If you want to give extra during this critical time, you can make a one-time or recurring monthly donation — whether it’s $1 or $1,000, every bit goes towards the battle to save our great nation.

You know all that online “disinformation” and “election interference” that the Dems frequently caution about? You probably won’t be too surprised to learn that they’re the main culprits, and they’re not even doing a good job. This information surfaced after a very popular liberal account with almost 150K followers, posing as a former Biden staffer named “Erica Marsh,” was revealed to be a bot managed by a foreign marketing firm that specializes in “social selling.”

erica marsh

The account is well-known for promoting left-wing propaganda and recently garnered a lot of attention for an outlandish comment surrounding the Supreme Court’s “affirmative action” decision. The tweet was so over-the-top, that it got over 9 million views.

Here was Erica’s comically hamhanded response to the ruling:

Today’s Supreme Court decision is a direct attack on Black people. No Black person will be able to succeed in a merit-based system which is exactly why affirmative-action based programs were needed. Today’s decision is a TRAVESTY!!!”

 

Lol! Erica made the mistake of taking liberalism and its hysterical reaction to the Supreme Court’s decision to a logical conclusion: blacks in America can’t succeed on merit. This is what the average liberal obviously believes, but rather than accepting that maybe not everyone is born with equal average intellectual ability and that’s perfectly okay, they rationalize that blacks can’t succeed on merit because racism is everywhere. Without racism and the legacy of slavery, the liberal believes, black people would have the exact same average test scores as whites and Asians and be perfectly proportionally represented at institutions like Harvard and Cal Tech. If the percentage of blacks at Harvard was only 2 percent or 4 percent rather than 13 percent on the dot, this would apparently be a great national catastrophe.

Erica’s aforementioned tweet in particular sparked an online firestorm, prompting many to take a closer look at “her” account character. In fact, Erica’s whole account read like that of a liberal who didn’t understand that you’re not supposed to actually take liberalism to its logical conclusion in more ways than one. Several folks did some digging around and they all reached the same conclusion: the account doesn’t belong to a former Biden staffer, nor to someone named “Erica Marsh.” It appears that the account is connected to a foreign marketing firm with links to Belgium and Germany.

Podcaster Greg Bolden shared a tweet thread explaining all of it. Here’s what he had to say:

This person does not exist. I repeat. Does NOT exist. This is election interference starting early. I will not even link to their page because it is dangerous to continue to follow and engage. This is an account bot linked to Belgium. This also shows how easy our elections are being influenced.

Image

This account is linked to a consulting firm in Belgium. Michael Zachrau is behind the liberal dystopian bot triggering conservatives. He’s a digital marketing, SEO, who labeles himself as “social selling”. Let that sink in. Social selling.

When democrats talk about the support for their candidates, and create bots as influencers, this is path modeling. It’s a scientific method to change the hearts and minds of people to peddle influence over the masses. This IS the election interference we have been warned about.

It’s also important to note, they are hiring firms to create the divide. This is not exclusive to democrats. You should question all divisive content that aims to manufacture outrage with no balance.

Hey Michael! Who approached you to push out social selling on Erica?

Image

And before google scrubs the search:

Image

The consulting firm appears to have either voluntarily or involuntarily had their website removed the web.

Greg Bolden’s followed up with a long tweet that reads:

A follow up to clarify before bed.

This image is what mines back to rhinestone. The website linked to http://Michael-zachrau.de – this is “Erica Marsh” which leads to his name being linked behind the liberal tweeting bot that based off who she followed and mapping linked to likely being funded as a manufactured outrage account.

I have no evidence that @michaelzachrau is or was Erica, nor did I claim that anywhere. (I also didn’t tag him originally because I don’t even know what his real Twitter account is – he commented, so tagging him here) i did state – “Michael Zachrau is behind the liberal dystopian bot triggering conservatives”. Meaning – that website has the “image” being used of Erica. I simply want to know why his company is linked to this – the website is his name?

Before Twitter loses their conspiracy theory minds, let’s stick to the facts and hear directly from him. I’ve asked him for a comment. People claiming this is him, missed the entire point of what I posted.

It doesn’t matter ultimately what his role is (perhaps his company bought AI images and just happened to have hers) – although he deserves accuracy, fairness, and truth. What matters is she was a fake, and the image and idea came from somewhere – and it manipulated millions.

In conclusion: hey @elonmusk are you able to fight back against social selling? This seems to be the most dangerous use of accounts on Twitter. #socialselling

Twitter has suspended the account, though the exact reason why is not known.

All the liberal foreign marketing firms out there should take note from “Erica’s” mistake and try to avoid ham-handedly following liberal logic to its hilarious and comical conclusions.

SUPPORT REVOLVER — DONATE — SUBSCRIBE — NEWSFEED — GAB — GETTR — TRUTH SOCIAL — TWITTER