Daniel Perry shot Antifa/BLM rioter who pointed an AR 15 at him while at least 24 rioters surrounded his vehicle (that’s how many sets of fingerprints were lifted from it). The prosecutors said he should have “driven away”, which he couldn’t & besides he had no duty to retreat.

I guess Perry should have allowed them to drag him out of his vehicle & beat him unconscious… as happened to Adam Haner in Portland.

Hey remember when libtards insisted that Kyle Rittenhouse was doing something wrong by being present at a riot with an AR 15? Garrett Foster (who Perry shot), ignored police warnings re how he carried his AK 47, wore a neoprene vest under his T-shirt & carried a club & a knife.

It’s different for Foster, a fat libtard “ally”, an unemployed antifa boogaloo boy with a black disabled girlfriend who cried in media & court, whereas Perry was Uber driver working overtime & a full time Army sergeant stationed at Fort Hood, so he’s the bad guy, obviously. 🙄

Oh by the way Austin police determined it was a justifiable homicide, but it was brought to grand jury by progressive prosecutor, against the wishes of the lead detective, who testified that the DA was engaged in both witness tampering and suppression of exculpatory evidence.

That’s right, the “decarceration” people literally overruled the determination of detectives, crime scene investigators, forensics etc. because they were so keen to prosecute Perry & make an example of him. Really makes you think. Maybe they not so into equity re “decarceration”?

Actually they are. This is what “equity” means. Punishing anyone who believes in the old system. The one where you had a right to self-defence & didn’t have to worship black people, let rioters attack you, or be self-flagellating/self hating if you’re white, in order to survive.

Nb: correction, typo in the first tweet, it should have said AK 47 not AR 15.